Publications /
Opinion

Back
Why Smart Institutions are Investing in AI, Not Fighting It
Authors
Imad Hajjaji
September 15, 2025

There is something almost predictable about how academic institutions react to disruptive technology. First comes resistance, then fear-mongering, and finally often too late grudging acceptance. This pattern has been repeated countless times throughout history.

Take the 1970s calculator controversy. Mathematics professors were genuinely worried that electronic calculators would somehow "dumb down" their students [1]. The irony? Those same tools ended up freeing mathematicians from tedious arithmetic, allowing them to tackle far more sophisticated problems. We've seen this story before and since. Statistical software like SPSS and R faced similar resistance from statisticians who thought automated analysis would make them obsolete. Digital databases? Academics were convinced they'd destroy scholarly research. Each time, the pattern was the same: early adopters thrived while the holdouts got left behind.

Now the academic world is dealing with artificial intelligence and the arguments around its impact sound remarkably familiar, with the same predictions of doom. Yet the data tells a completely different story.

Consider this reality: 92% of British students are already using AI tools in some capacity [2]. That's not a small pilot program or an experimental initiative that's widespread adoption happening whether institutions like it or not. Meanwhile, generative AI usage in professional settings jumped from 33% to 71% in just one year [3]. These aren't numbers anyone can ignore.

Resarchers who've embraced AI tools including ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity aren't becoming less capable, they're becoming more productive [4]. They're using these platforms for brainstorming, drafting, data analysis, and literature reviews. However, the picture isn't entirely rosy some studies suggest that while AI tools can boost efficiency, they may also lead to reduced job satisfaction due to decreased creativity and skill underutilization among researchers.

In educational settings, AI-powered adaptive learning systems are improving student test scores by 62% [5]. These aren't marginal gains; they're transformational improvements that any serious institution should want to capture.

But here's what's really exciting: the smart institutions aren't just using AI, they're monetizing it. Universities are licensing their research data, their archived publications, and their specialized datasets to AI companies [6].They're turning decades of accumulated knowledge into revenue streams while simultaneously contributing to technological advancement. It's a win-win scenario that the lagging institutions are completely missing out on.

Some people argue for special protections, regulations that would slow AI development to protect traditional academic methods. This approach seems fundamentally misguided. Could anyone have protected slide rules from calculators? Encyclopedia publishers from Wikipedia? Of course not. The market—and more importantly, human progress—moved forward regardless.

The institutions that are thriving today are those that give their researchers freedom to experiment with AI tools[7]. They're not micromanaging the process or creating bureaucratic hurdles. They're simply saying: “Here are the tools—figure out how to use them effectively”.

History has a way of being brutally honest about these transitions. The institutions that adapt early tend to lead their fields for decades. Those that resist often find themselves playing catch-up, scrambling to implement technologies that their competitors have already mastered.

Academic institutions don't need to protect researchers from AI. They need to give them the resources and freedom to harness its potential. Because if there's one certainty, it's that the next breakthrough in any field is more likely to come from someone using AI tools than from someone avoiding them.

The choice is clear: invest in AI integration or watch from the sidelines as others race ahead. Smart institutions have already made their decision.

References

[1] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s. NCTM.

[2] Anara. (2025). "AI in Higher Education Statistics: The Complete 2025 Report." https://anara.com/blog/ai-in-education-statistics

[3] McKinsey. (2025). "The State of AI: Global survey." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai

[4] Reddit r/PhdProductivity. (2025). "What AI tools (besides ChatGPT) do you actually use in your PhD?" https://www.reddit.com/r/PhdProductivity/comments/1kvepen/what_ai_tools_besides_chatgpt_do_you_actually_use/

[5] ScienceDirect. (2024). "Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424010339

[6] Microsoft. (2025). "AI-powered success—with more than 1,000 stories of customer transformation and innovation." https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-cloud/blog/2025/07/24/ai-powered-success-with-1000-stories-of-customer-transformation-and-innovation/

[7] McKinsey. (2025). "The next innovation revolution—powered by AI." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-next-innovation-revolution-powered-by-

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    Mohammed Hatimi
    April 22, 2020
    Particulièrement, tout autant qu’intentionnellement, avares en matière d’information sur la vie sociale et le quotidien des Musulmans pendant les catastrophes, naturelles et sanitaires, les sources arabes, dites classiques, le sont aussi au sujet des Juifs. Les Juifs, pourtant nombreux dans la cité, ne sont mentionnés que lorsqu’il s’agit de faits à l’origine d’incommodité ; la vie à l’intérieur des mellahs ne suscitait que très peu d’intérêt. Il fallait attendre le temps des a ...
  • Authors
    April 22, 2020
    Imagine you are one of the crew members of the nuclear-powered fast-attack submarine USS Connecticut, 1000 meters under the floating ice of the Arctic Ocean. Your three-month secret mission is only in its third week. Suddenly, the sailor above your bunk starts coughing, the neighbor signals he has a fever, and the onboard medical officer alerts his commanding officer that 55 of the 116 crew are showing advanced symptoms of COVID-19. There is no nearby human settlement to go to, just ...
  • Authors
    Pierre Jacquemot
    April 21, 2020
    Il est encore prématuré d’évaluer l’ampleur de la pandémie du Coronavirus en Afrique, mais tout laisse à penser qu’elle frappera de plein fouet des systèmes de santé – de la prévention à la prise en charge des malades - déjà vulnérables. Diverses résiliences sont à l’épreuve avec des effets péjoratifs, surtout à l’encontre des plus pauvres, moins armés pour respecter les mesures d’astreintes et plus fragiles dans leur quotidien. Des leçons peuvent toutefois être tirées des expérienc ...
  • April 21, 2020
    Parmi les questions débattues dans les milieux de la décision économique et de la réflexion académique, dans les pays du Nord comme dans les pays du Sud en développement, en ce moment d’arrêt économique et d’accélération de l’histoire, un thème a ressurgi avec force : celui du revenu universel de base, le transfert inconditionnel, sur une période donnée ou de façon permanente, d’un montant d’argent par l’État à tous les citoyens qui répondent à une série de critères d’éligibilité si ...
  • Authors
    Aziz Ajbilou
    April 20, 2020
    La crise du Covid-19 ne cesse d’impacter les économies des pays du monde entier, aussi bien dans les pays développés que dans les pays en voie de développement. La situation serait plus délicate pour les pays pauvres. L’économie de ces pays est moins résiliente aux chocs et fortement tributaire des échanges commerciaux[1]. Les taux de chômage risquent de grimper et probablement pour une période assez longue. Les entreprises ayant pris des mesures pour arrêter totalement leurs activi ...
  • April 20, 2020
    Le processus de mondialisation, si solide soit-il, se trouve à l’épreuve d’une crise sanitaire mondiale inattendue et brutale. Cette réalité adresse au monde une question qui interpelle autant les décideurs, les managers que les chercheurs : Que pourraient être les effets du Covid-19 sur l’économie politique internationale ? Rupture, continuité ou inflexion ? Une des perspectives qu’il convient de surveiller est celle relative à l’inflexion du processus de la mondial ...
  • Authors
    Dr. Horst Melcher
    April 20, 2020
    Environmentally sustainable development was the leading theme at the World Economic Forum in Davos in late January 2020. Just two months later, places including Wuhan in China, California’s Bay Area, and New York City experienced unusually blue skies and clean air as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. What has happened is unprecedented and has replaced, for now, the long-term climate change agenda with a short-term public health pandemic agenda as the foremost global urgency. H ...
  • April 20, 2020
    Le marché du travail subit de plein fouet les conséquences des ravages du nouveau Coronavirus. Selon l’Organisation internationale du Travail (OIT), sur les 3,3 milliards de la population active occupée mondiale, plus de 4 personnes sur 5 sont affectées par la fermeture totale ou partielle des lieux de travail. Dans la présente note, nous revenons, en détail, sur la situation du marché de l’emploi mondial dans ce contexte de crise, avant de se livrer à une discussion des grandes mut ...
  • Authors
    Salma Daoudi
    April 20, 2020
    Bien que les organisations multilatérales se soient multipliées sur le devant de la scène de gouvernance sanitaire mondiale depuis le XXème siècle, le domaine sanitaire relève historiquement de la souveraineté exclusive de l’Etat. S’inscrivant au cœur du contrat social liant l’Etat au peuple, la protection de ce dernier est une responsabilité qu’il incombe au gouvernement d’assumer afin de légitimer et d’asseoir son autorité. En outre, la bonne santé de la population demeure un pili ...
  • Authors
    April 17, 2020
    The COVID-19 pandemic threatens to wreak more havoc in developing countries than in developed countries, because of the crumbling healthcare systems and infrastructures in the former, their inadequate budgetary resources, shallow financial systems, and weak government authority and capability. This impact has not yet shown up in cross-country data, possibly reflecting extensive under-reporting and/or less testing for COVID-19 done in developing countries. Policymakers in these count ...