Publications /
Opinion

Back
Why the UN Should Move to Shanghai
September 19, 2025

Few symbols capture the post-war international order as vividly as the United Nations headquarters in New York. Officially opened in 1952, the building was conceived as both the stage of global governance and the emblem of Allied victory. Yet, nearly eight decades later, it is worth asking whether its location still reflects the true centre of gravity of world affairs. As the 80th Ordinary Session of the United Nations General Assembly approaches, economic transformation, geopolitical realignment, and the rise of alternative institutions suggest reconsidering whether New York remains the most appropriate seat. In this context, relocating the United Nations to Shanghai appears not only plausible but increasingly necessary.

The first reason concerns the waning centrality of the US dollar. In recent decades, Washington has increasingly weaponized its currency, imposing unilateral sanctions and excluding adversaries from the SWIFT system. Such practices erode trust in the international monetary order and accelerate the search for alternatives. The emergence of the BRICS New Development Bank and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank illustrates the consolidation of a multipolar financial architecture. Maintaining the UN headquarters in the very country that has weakened the system it claims to uphold is both contradictory and outdated.

The second reason is demographic and economic. Asia is home to more than half of humanity and now drives the fastest and most dynamic growth rates globally. Today, global economic dynamism resides not as much in Europe or the United States but in Asian cities that have emerged as hubs of innovation, trade, and finance. Relocating the UN to Shanghai would acknowledge this reality both symbolically and practically. As China’s foremost financial centre, Shanghai combines safety, world-class infrastructure, global connectivity, and cosmopolitan character, making it a natural host for a universal institution. The economic benefits of such a move—including increased investment and job creation—are also significant. Representation demands that global governance structures be located closer to the regions where most people live and where the future of the world economy is being forged. In this sense, Shanghai would embody a more accurate reflection of the Global South.

The third reason concerns security and diplomatic neutrality. New York suffers from growing urban insecurity, compounded by discriminatory visa practices against diplomats from states at odds with Washington. Such measures undermine the Headquarters Agreement between the US and the UN, which guarantees universal and unrestricted access. By contrast, China offers safety and shows readiness to ensure equal treatment for all states. With its long tradition of commercial openness and cultural exchange, Shanghai could embody the inclusiveness and impartiality the UN needs to preserve its legitimacy.

History provides a compelling precedent. When the League of Nations was created after the First World War, Geneva was chosen precisely because it offered neutrality, accessibility, and an environment conducive to dialogue. The UN’s placement in New York reflected American leadership in the post-war order. Yet keeping the institution in the same location risks reducing it to a relic of a bygone era, rather than allowing it to serve as a beacon for the future. Institutions must evolve with shifting power balances—or risk ossifying into monuments of nostalgia.

Together, these factors reveal a broader shift in the axis of global governance. The strengthening of BRICS, the consolidation of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, and the emergence of institutional alternatives to the Western model all signal a reorganization of the global order. Relocating the UN headquarters to Asia would not be a mere symbolic act but a necessary adaptation to a century in which power is shifting eastwards.

Initiating this discussion now is crucial, as it would allow the international community to prepare for a smooth transition of the headquarters to Shanghai by 2035. History shows that institutions which fail to adapt to their times risk becoming irrelevant. For the United Nations to remain the central forum of humanity, it must reflect the world as it truly is. Increasingly, that world revolves around the Asian dynamism that Shanghai embodies.

Kofi Annan once reminded us: “We can love what we are, without hating what—and who—we are not.” To relocate the UN to Shanghai would not be a repudiation of its history in New York, but recognition that humanity’s future demands a broader canvas. By moving eastward, the United Nations would align itself with the realities of our century and renew its universal vocation as the true parliament of humankind. Relocating the UN would foster deeper global cooperation and understanding by positioning it closer to the regions where most people live and where the future of the world’s economy is being shaped.

 

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    October 1, 2025
    The era of relative stability grounded in post-Second World War idealism, and a global compact around the principle of supporting the most vulnerable, is coming to an abrupt close. In its place is hard-nosed realpolitik, raw power, and transactional politics. The current discordant, fractious epoch—despite the sense of foreboding and crises in some quarters—may yet create the space and conditions for much needed honest dialogue on the future of development cooperation. This dialogue ...
  • September 24, 2025
    Il y a presque deux ans, le Burkina Faso, le Mali et le Niger ont quitté la CEDEAO (Communauté économique des États de l’Afrique de l’Ouest) - Organisation régionale regroupant quinze pays- pour créer un nouveau groupement d’intégration: l’Alliance des États du Sahel (AES).  Les motivations des trois pays ne sont pas conjoncturelles. Elles reflètent les difficultés de l’Organisation régionale à accompagner les pays en question dans leur quête de sécurité et de développemen ...
  • September 19, 2025
    Few symbols capture the post-war international order as vividly as the United Nations headquarters in New York. Officially opened in 1952, the building was conceived as both the stage of global governance and the emblem of Allied victory. Yet, nearly eight decades later, it is worth asking whether its location still reflects the true centre of gravity of world affairs. As the 80th Ordinary Session of the United Nations General Assembly approaches, economic transformation, geopolitic ...
  • September 17, 2025
    Cet épisode s’interroge sur l’avenir des blocs régionaux africains, pris entre l’idéal d’intégration et une réalité marquée par la fragmentation. De la fragilisation de la CEDEAO à l’émergence de l’Alliance des États du Sahel, en passant par l’influence croissante d’acteurs extérieurs, ...
  • Authors
    September 2, 2025
    This paper argues that the Middle East has become the crucible of twenty-first-century imperial politics, exposing the collapse of legal universality and the resurgence of coercive empire. Through the archetypes of Hammurabi and Nebuchadnezzar, it analyzes how states invoke law rhetorically while practicing domination through siege, spectacle, and exclusion.The United States, China, Türkiye, Israel, Iran, the European Union, and the Gulf monarchies all oscillate between Hammurabian ...
  • August 28, 2025
    Alors que l’ordre mondial bascule vers un système multipolaire, l’Afrique se trouve face à un tournant décisif. Comment éviter la marginalisation et tirer parti de ses atouts stratégiques ? Entre partenariats concurrentiels des grandes puissances, montée du Sud global et élargissement d...
  • August 01, 2025
    In this episode, we explore how the United Nations works beyond traditional peacekeeping contexts to support justice and security sector reform in fragile contexts. Our guest, Jérôme Mell ...
  • July 31, 2025
    This episode explores Africa's role amid a shifting global order marked by fragmentation and competing blocs. It examines whether African states are passive responders or active shapers of new strategic alignments like BRICS+ and South–South cooperation. The discussion also addresses Af...
  • Authors
    Bruno Saraiva
    July 21, 2025
    This article assesses the economic performance of the original BRICS economies, relative to the growth and currency appreciation projections presented in the papers that introduced the acronym, prior to the grouping becoming a diplomatic, political, and economic reality. It also discusses the BRICS agenda in the current challenging geopolitical context, in which economic fragmentation tends to raise costs for the global economy and presents considerable obstacles for emerging and de ...
  • July 18, 2025
    Vingt ans après sa création, le Parlement panafricain demeure un organe institutionnel marginalisé au sein de l’Union africaine. Pensé comme instrument de représentation des peuples africains, il n’a jamais acquis les prérogatives ni les relais lui permettant de jouer un rôle politique important. Ce Policy Paper analyse les raisons de cette impasse à partir de trois angles : la faiblesse institutionnelle et le déficit de légitimité du PAP ; le blocage du Protocole de Malabo, révélat ...