Publications /
Opinion

Back
Why Smart Institutions are Investing in AI, Not Fighting It
Authors
Imad Hajjaji
September 15, 2025

There is something almost predictable about how academic institutions react to disruptive technology. First comes resistance, then fear-mongering, and finally often too late grudging acceptance. This pattern has been repeated countless times throughout history.

Take the 1970s calculator controversy. Mathematics professors were genuinely worried that electronic calculators would somehow "dumb down" their students [1]. The irony? Those same tools ended up freeing mathematicians from tedious arithmetic, allowing them to tackle far more sophisticated problems. We've seen this story before and since. Statistical software like SPSS and R faced similar resistance from statisticians who thought automated analysis would make them obsolete. Digital databases? Academics were convinced they'd destroy scholarly research. Each time, the pattern was the same: early adopters thrived while the holdouts got left behind.

Now the academic world is dealing with artificial intelligence and the arguments around its impact sound remarkably familiar, with the same predictions of doom. Yet the data tells a completely different story.

Consider this reality: 92% of British students are already using AI tools in some capacity [2]. That's not a small pilot program or an experimental initiative that's widespread adoption happening whether institutions like it or not. Meanwhile, generative AI usage in professional settings jumped from 33% to 71% in just one year [3]. These aren't numbers anyone can ignore.

Resarchers who've embraced AI tools including ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity aren't becoming less capable, they're becoming more productive [4]. They're using these platforms for brainstorming, drafting, data analysis, and literature reviews. However, the picture isn't entirely rosy some studies suggest that while AI tools can boost efficiency, they may also lead to reduced job satisfaction due to decreased creativity and skill underutilization among researchers.

In educational settings, AI-powered adaptive learning systems are improving student test scores by 62% [5]. These aren't marginal gains; they're transformational improvements that any serious institution should want to capture.

But here's what's really exciting: the smart institutions aren't just using AI, they're monetizing it. Universities are licensing their research data, their archived publications, and their specialized datasets to AI companies [6].They're turning decades of accumulated knowledge into revenue streams while simultaneously contributing to technological advancement. It's a win-win scenario that the lagging institutions are completely missing out on.

Some people argue for special protections, regulations that would slow AI development to protect traditional academic methods. This approach seems fundamentally misguided. Could anyone have protected slide rules from calculators? Encyclopedia publishers from Wikipedia? Of course not. The market—and more importantly, human progress—moved forward regardless.

The institutions that are thriving today are those that give their researchers freedom to experiment with AI tools[7]. They're not micromanaging the process or creating bureaucratic hurdles. They're simply saying: “Here are the tools—figure out how to use them effectively”.

History has a way of being brutally honest about these transitions. The institutions that adapt early tend to lead their fields for decades. Those that resist often find themselves playing catch-up, scrambling to implement technologies that their competitors have already mastered.

Academic institutions don't need to protect researchers from AI. They need to give them the resources and freedom to harness its potential. Because if there's one certainty, it's that the next breakthrough in any field is more likely to come from someone using AI tools than from someone avoiding them.

The choice is clear: invest in AI integration or watch from the sidelines as others race ahead. Smart institutions have already made their decision.

References

[1] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s. NCTM.

[2] Anara. (2025). "AI in Higher Education Statistics: The Complete 2025 Report." https://anara.com/blog/ai-in-education-statistics

[3] McKinsey. (2025). "The State of AI: Global survey." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai

[4] Reddit r/PhdProductivity. (2025). "What AI tools (besides ChatGPT) do you actually use in your PhD?" https://www.reddit.com/r/PhdProductivity/comments/1kvepen/what_ai_tools_besides_chatgpt_do_you_actually_use/

[5] ScienceDirect. (2024). "Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424010339

[6] Microsoft. (2025). "AI-powered success—with more than 1,000 stories of customer transformation and innovation." https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-cloud/blog/2025/07/24/ai-powered-success-with-1000-stories-of-customer-transformation-and-innovation/

[7] McKinsey. (2025). "The next innovation revolution—powered by AI." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-next-innovation-revolution-powered-by-

RELATED CONTENT

  • September 1, 2019
    Income inequality is high in Morocco. In 2013, the share of national income1  of the richest 10% in Morocco stood at nearly 32%, 12 times higher than the share of national income of the poorest 10% of the population. This paper argues that, drawing on international experience, there is much more that Morocco’s government can do to reduce inequality while at the same time enhancing growth and – possibly – doing so in a manner that is budget-neutral or even budget-positive. Top o ...
  • August 23, 2019
    Income inequality is high in Morocco. In 2013, the share of national income of the richest 10% in Morocco stood at nearly 32%, 12 times higher than the share of national income of the poorest 10% of the population. High inequality can adversely affect long-term growth as it tends to be associated with underutilization of human potential. This paper argues that, drawing on international experience, there is much more that Morocco’s government can do to reduce inequality while at the ...
  • Authors
    Tosin Durotoye
    July 31, 2019
    Tosin Durotoye is an alumna of the Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders Program 2018.  On an unremarkable day in 2015, I woke up and decided it was time to move back home. At the time, “home” was the United States where I’d spent my formative years and lived for over 20 years. However, my birth home – the home at the core of my identity and the home I would be returning to - was Nigeria. My family had immigrated to the U.S. during the Abacha era – a time of great social a ...
  • Authors
    Richard Seshie
    July 26, 2019
    Richard Seshie est un Alumni du programme des Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders 2017. Cet article a été précédemment publié ici.  Il prévaut fortement cette idée que nos pouvoirs publics ne sauraient jouer un rôle important pour les startups en Afrique. Dans plusieurs pays, leur nonchalance ou implication maladroite passée laisse dubitatif. Toutefois, c'est la nature historiquement extravertie de nos économies et ses implications qui devrait susciter plus qu' ...
  • Authors
    July 24, 2019
    Poker is a game for real men, cowboys, for example, ocean divers, stunt men, gambling away their meager pay. Poker is America, as oversized as trucks, egos and steaks. A gambler’s paradise. 24/24. Drinks on the house, a discount for the bridal suite. Poker made its way from quaint southern New Orleans to the rough west, where gold diggers gambled away fortunes, and settlers risked their wagons and horses for a game of cards. Decades ago, I met a descendent of this wild bunch in Las ...
  • Authors
    Rumbidzai Chisenga
    July 23, 2019
    The author is an alumna of the Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders Program 2017.  “Sub-Saharan Africa accounts for 13.5% of the global population but less than 1% of global research output” – this is according to a 2018 research article co-authored by eight Vice Chancellors of African universities. The state of knowledge production in sub Saharan Africa is sobering to say the least, and even more so in light of the bold ambitions the continent has for the future ...
  • Authors
    John Stackhouse
    July 16, 2019
    This article was originally published on RBC Royal Bank's innovation & perspective section. Kevin Vuong, Executive Lead, International & Lecturer, University of Toronto, Canada and Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leader Alum 2018 contributed to this piece. From the route you take home to where you choose to go for lunch, we have our own inherent preferences that predispose us to a particular decision. And while we assume that our choices are rational, ...
  • Authors
    Chika Uwazie
    July 9, 2019
    The author is an alumnus of the 2017 Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders program Globalization has led to discourses on leadership and management having different perspectives. Today, one of the discourses includes gender diversity in leadership positions across organizations. The data continuously shows that women’s access to the coveted C-suite and management positions in organizations are comparatively limited. Therefore, this piece examines women’s representation on A ...
  • Authors
    Renato Schwambach Vieira
    Miguel Stevanato Jacob
    Ana Waksberg Guerrini
    Eduardo Germani
    Fernando Barreto
    Miguel Luiz Bucalem
    Pedro Levy Sayon
    June 3, 2019
    This paper estimates the socioeconomic impacts of the emergence and expansion of e-hailing services in São Paulo, Brazil. Combining data from a major service provider, individual level data from a representative travel diary survey and a structural traffic network simulation, we evaluate the impact of e-hailing on commuters' travel time and accessibility. We then estimate the effect of these changes on workers' productivity. Finally, using a Spatial Computable General Equilibrium (S ...
  • Authors
    Naakoshie Mills
    May 31, 2019
    The author is an alumnus of the 2016 Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders program People centered development is the crux of the African Union’s (AU) new Agenda 2063 initiative. Its overall goal is a Pan African transformation and development of its member countries, while reframing the continent’s presence on the global stage. Fortunately, women’s equality is one of its aims, addressing discrimination, gender-based violence, and empowerment, to name a few. As develop ...