Publications /
Opinion

Back
Why Smart Institutions are Investing in AI, Not Fighting It
Authors
Imad Hajjaji
September 15, 2025

There is something almost predictable about how academic institutions react to disruptive technology. First comes resistance, then fear-mongering, and finally often too late grudging acceptance. This pattern has been repeated countless times throughout history.

Take the 1970s calculator controversy. Mathematics professors were genuinely worried that electronic calculators would somehow "dumb down" their students [1]. The irony? Those same tools ended up freeing mathematicians from tedious arithmetic, allowing them to tackle far more sophisticated problems. We've seen this story before and since. Statistical software like SPSS and R faced similar resistance from statisticians who thought automated analysis would make them obsolete. Digital databases? Academics were convinced they'd destroy scholarly research. Each time, the pattern was the same: early adopters thrived while the holdouts got left behind.

Now the academic world is dealing with artificial intelligence and the arguments around its impact sound remarkably familiar, with the same predictions of doom. Yet the data tells a completely different story.

Consider this reality: 92% of British students are already using AI tools in some capacity [2]. That's not a small pilot program or an experimental initiative that's widespread adoption happening whether institutions like it or not. Meanwhile, generative AI usage in professional settings jumped from 33% to 71% in just one year [3]. These aren't numbers anyone can ignore.

Resarchers who've embraced AI tools including ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity aren't becoming less capable, they're becoming more productive [4]. They're using these platforms for brainstorming, drafting, data analysis, and literature reviews. However, the picture isn't entirely rosy some studies suggest that while AI tools can boost efficiency, they may also lead to reduced job satisfaction due to decreased creativity and skill underutilization among researchers.

In educational settings, AI-powered adaptive learning systems are improving student test scores by 62% [5]. These aren't marginal gains; they're transformational improvements that any serious institution should want to capture.

But here's what's really exciting: the smart institutions aren't just using AI, they're monetizing it. Universities are licensing their research data, their archived publications, and their specialized datasets to AI companies [6].They're turning decades of accumulated knowledge into revenue streams while simultaneously contributing to technological advancement. It's a win-win scenario that the lagging institutions are completely missing out on.

Some people argue for special protections, regulations that would slow AI development to protect traditional academic methods. This approach seems fundamentally misguided. Could anyone have protected slide rules from calculators? Encyclopedia publishers from Wikipedia? Of course not. The market—and more importantly, human progress—moved forward regardless.

The institutions that are thriving today are those that give their researchers freedom to experiment with AI tools[7]. They're not micromanaging the process or creating bureaucratic hurdles. They're simply saying: “Here are the tools—figure out how to use them effectively”.

History has a way of being brutally honest about these transitions. The institutions that adapt early tend to lead their fields for decades. Those that resist often find themselves playing catch-up, scrambling to implement technologies that their competitors have already mastered.

Academic institutions don't need to protect researchers from AI. They need to give them the resources and freedom to harness its potential. Because if there's one certainty, it's that the next breakthrough in any field is more likely to come from someone using AI tools than from someone avoiding them.

The choice is clear: invest in AI integration or watch from the sidelines as others race ahead. Smart institutions have already made their decision.

References

[1] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s. NCTM.

[2] Anara. (2025). "AI in Higher Education Statistics: The Complete 2025 Report." https://anara.com/blog/ai-in-education-statistics

[3] McKinsey. (2025). "The State of AI: Global survey." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai

[4] Reddit r/PhdProductivity. (2025). "What AI tools (besides ChatGPT) do you actually use in your PhD?" https://www.reddit.com/r/PhdProductivity/comments/1kvepen/what_ai_tools_besides_chatgpt_do_you_actually_use/

[5] ScienceDirect. (2024). "Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424010339

[6] Microsoft. (2025). "AI-powered success—with more than 1,000 stories of customer transformation and innovation." https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-cloud/blog/2025/07/24/ai-powered-success-with-1000-stories-of-customer-transformation-and-innovation/

[7] McKinsey. (2025). "The next innovation revolution—powered by AI." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-next-innovation-revolution-powered-by-

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    December 18, 2017
    Sous cet intitulé, la seconde journée des Atlantic Dialogues, le 14 décembre, a abordé la question de l’éducation. Une urgence absolue, compte tenu de la transition démographique en cours en Afrique et de la persistance d’un fort chômage des jeunes – même diplômés – dans de nombreux pays. Mme Assia Bensahlah Alaoui, Ambassadeur itinérant du Roi du Maroc Mohammed VI, figure respectée qui milite pour un mieux vivre ensemble dans l’islam, a évoqué le “besoin de réhabili ...
  • Authors
    December 14, 2017
    A more realistic image of Africa has been recommended by participants of a Breakout Dinner on the continental“narratives”, during the 6th edition of the Atlantic Dialogues. This discussion is reported here under the Chatham House rules – i.e. no quotes from the participants, who have expressed their views off the record.     Changing the narratives on Africa has to do with exploiting Africans full potential: plural identities evolving in various fields, booming content pr ...
  • Authors
    December 7, 2017
    The CNN report broadcasted on November 14th on a sale of African migrants as slaves in Lybia has caused a wave of shock and protest. More than ever, the African migration, often perceived as a scourge, is on the agenda. The Atlantic Dialogues will discuss it in another way. Why ? Because the cold analysis of facts and figures shows that the African clandestine migration to Europe, far from an invasion, may well be an opportunity...  « African Migr ...
  • Authors
    November 17, 2017
    The OCP Policy Center took part in The High Level Policy Dialogue on Conflict and Development in the Horn of Africa, jointly organized by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) Peace and Security Division on November 13th-15th, 2017 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Serving as a platform for discussion between policy-makers and experts, this dialogue provided relevant case studies and figures to understand the ...
  • November 7, 2017
    In July 2017, the OCP Policy Center published a collective work entitled Social Cohesion, Institutions and Public Policies directed by Professor Abdallah Saaf, Senior Fellow at OCP Policy Center. This publication is the result of reflections and discussions exchanged during a conference organized on Thursday, October 27, 2016, and which subsequently were transposed into written contributions. On this occasion, the authors set out to shed light on the concept of "social cohesion" by ...
  • November 7, 2017
    En juillet 2017, l’OCP Policy Center a publié un ouvrage collectif intitulé Cohésion Sociale, Institutions et Politiques Publiques sous la direction du Professeur Abdallah Saaf, Senior Fellow à OCP Policy Center. Cet ouvrage est le fruit des différentes réflexions échangées à l’occasion d’une conférence organisée le Jeudi 27 Octobre 2016 qui se sont traduites par des contributions écrites. A cette occasion, les auteurs se sont donné comme objectif d’éclairer la notion de « cohésion ...
  • Authors
    Ana Maria Bonomi Barufi 
    October 21, 2017
    Location decisions of firms and workers shape the spatial distribution of economic activity between and within cities. On one hand, the interaction between cities is widely investigated in the literature of regional and urban economics, which tries to assess the extent to which urban scale affects the local concentration of different skills, sectors, etc., apart from defining each city's role in the regional system. On the other hand, within-city dynamics and internal heterogeneity ...
  • Authors
    October 12, 2017
    Les théoriciens du Sud –mais aussi du Nord– participent de plus en plus aux débats mettant au centre les expériences du « Sud global » ainsi que le rôle de l’Afrique dans la nouvelle géo-économie mondiale. Le continent Africain subi encore des réflexions et théories qui ne prennent pas en considération les spécificités du développement et de l’émergence des sociétés africaines dans un contexte mondialisé contemporain. Dans cette optique, le colloque organisé par l’OCP Policy Center ...
  • Authors
    Thomas Awazu Pereira da Silva
    October 4, 2017
    Is Education in crisis worldwide? It surely is a fundamental issue of national and international development for Morocco’s policy makers. Recent reforms point to a key moment and momentum builder in public policy and policy implementation for the Kingdom. Policy makers agree that Education touches on fundamental themes of development economics as well as cognitive growth and ethics. It is behind human capital accumulation, and thus productivity and economic growth benefits from inte ...