Publications /
Opinion

Back
Why Smart Institutions are Investing in AI, Not Fighting It
Authors
Imad Hajjaji
September 15, 2025

There is something almost predictable about how academic institutions react to disruptive technology. First comes resistance, then fear-mongering, and finally often too late grudging acceptance. This pattern has been repeated countless times throughout history.

Take the 1970s calculator controversy. Mathematics professors were genuinely worried that electronic calculators would somehow "dumb down" their students [1]. The irony? Those same tools ended up freeing mathematicians from tedious arithmetic, allowing them to tackle far more sophisticated problems. We've seen this story before and since. Statistical software like SPSS and R faced similar resistance from statisticians who thought automated analysis would make them obsolete. Digital databases? Academics were convinced they'd destroy scholarly research. Each time, the pattern was the same: early adopters thrived while the holdouts got left behind.

Now the academic world is dealing with artificial intelligence and the arguments around its impact sound remarkably familiar, with the same predictions of doom. Yet the data tells a completely different story.

Consider this reality: 92% of British students are already using AI tools in some capacity [2]. That's not a small pilot program or an experimental initiative that's widespread adoption happening whether institutions like it or not. Meanwhile, generative AI usage in professional settings jumped from 33% to 71% in just one year [3]. These aren't numbers anyone can ignore.

Resarchers who've embraced AI tools including ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity aren't becoming less capable, they're becoming more productive [4]. They're using these platforms for brainstorming, drafting, data analysis, and literature reviews. However, the picture isn't entirely rosy some studies suggest that while AI tools can boost efficiency, they may also lead to reduced job satisfaction due to decreased creativity and skill underutilization among researchers.

In educational settings, AI-powered adaptive learning systems are improving student test scores by 62% [5]. These aren't marginal gains; they're transformational improvements that any serious institution should want to capture.

But here's what's really exciting: the smart institutions aren't just using AI, they're monetizing it. Universities are licensing their research data, their archived publications, and their specialized datasets to AI companies [6].They're turning decades of accumulated knowledge into revenue streams while simultaneously contributing to technological advancement. It's a win-win scenario that the lagging institutions are completely missing out on.

Some people argue for special protections, regulations that would slow AI development to protect traditional academic methods. This approach seems fundamentally misguided. Could anyone have protected slide rules from calculators? Encyclopedia publishers from Wikipedia? Of course not. The market—and more importantly, human progress—moved forward regardless.

The institutions that are thriving today are those that give their researchers freedom to experiment with AI tools[7]. They're not micromanaging the process or creating bureaucratic hurdles. They're simply saying: “Here are the tools—figure out how to use them effectively”.

History has a way of being brutally honest about these transitions. The institutions that adapt early tend to lead their fields for decades. Those that resist often find themselves playing catch-up, scrambling to implement technologies that their competitors have already mastered.

Academic institutions don't need to protect researchers from AI. They need to give them the resources and freedom to harness its potential. Because if there's one certainty, it's that the next breakthrough in any field is more likely to come from someone using AI tools than from someone avoiding them.

The choice is clear: invest in AI integration or watch from the sidelines as others race ahead. Smart institutions have already made their decision.

References

[1] National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An Agenda for Action: Recommendations for School Mathematics of the 1980s. NCTM.

[2] Anara. (2025). "AI in Higher Education Statistics: The Complete 2025 Report." https://anara.com/blog/ai-in-education-statistics

[3] McKinsey. (2025). "The State of AI: Global survey." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai

[4] Reddit r/PhdProductivity. (2025). "What AI tools (besides ChatGPT) do you actually use in your PhD?" https://www.reddit.com/r/PhdProductivity/comments/1kvepen/what_ai_tools_besides_chatgpt_do_you_actually_use/

[5] ScienceDirect. (2024). "Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review." https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417424010339

[6] Microsoft. (2025). "AI-powered success—with more than 1,000 stories of customer transformation and innovation." https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-cloud/blog/2025/07/24/ai-powered-success-with-1000-stories-of-customer-transformation-and-innovation/

[7] McKinsey. (2025). "The next innovation revolution—powered by AI." https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-next-innovation-revolution-powered-by-

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    Sabine Cessou
    October 25, 2019
    Jeune banquier congolais, Eric Ntumba est venu de Kinshasa en décembre 2017 pour participer au programme Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders du Policy Center for the New South (PCNS) à Marrakech. À l’époque, lorsqu’on lui demandait quel était son rêve, il déclarait d’emblée : « Devenir président de la République démocratique du Congo (RDC) et apporter un développement inclusif, pour faire que le potentiel énorme de ce pays se transforme enfin en puissance. Mon rêve es ...
  • Authors
    Paula Tavares
    October 25, 2019
    As world leaders gathered this month for high-level talks at the 74th United Nations General Assembly, pressing global issues were at the forefront of discussions, including progress toward the 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). While taking stock of how far we have come in realizing commitments in key areas, including to end poverty and hunger, expand access to health, education, justice and jobs, promote inclusive and sustained economic growth, and protect o ...
  • October 1, 2019
    Some of the papers in this special issue were initially presented at a September 2016 conference on Global Labor Markets organized by the IMF, Policy Center for the New South and Brunel University, while others were commissioned through a call for papers. Funding for this initiative was provided in part through the IF-DFID program on Macroeconomic Research in Low Income Countries. Views expressed in this introduction and in the papers are those of the authors and should not be ascri ...
  • September 30, 2019
    Notre Senior Fellow a répondu aux questions suivantes : 1/ Dans la région du Moyen-Orient et d’Afrique du Nord, en 2016 la part du revenu global des 1% les plus riches était 2,6 fois plus important que celle des 50% les plus pauvres. Sur quels leviers agir pour réduire les inégalités da...
  • Authors
    Leonardo Parraga
    September 5, 2019
    Leonardo Parraga is an alumnus of the Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders Program 2016.  The rise of globalization has given space to cooperation across borders in unprecedented ways. The interconnectedness between different actors allows for the creation of synergies and catalyzing progress in different areas, a feature that was previously unthinkable. When it comes to cooperation amongst young people, the increasing wave of meeting spaces facilitating the encounter ...
  • September 1, 2019
    Income inequality is high in Morocco. In 2013, the share of national income1  of the richest 10% in Morocco stood at nearly 32%, 12 times higher than the share of national income of the poorest 10% of the population. This paper argues that, drawing on international experience, there is much more that Morocco’s government can do to reduce inequality while at the same time enhancing growth and – possibly – doing so in a manner that is budget-neutral or even budget-positive. Top o ...
  • August 23, 2019
    Income inequality is high in Morocco. In 2013, the share of national income of the richest 10% in Morocco stood at nearly 32%, 12 times higher than the share of national income of the poorest 10% of the population. High inequality can adversely affect long-term growth as it tends to be associated with underutilization of human potential. This paper argues that, drawing on international experience, there is much more that Morocco’s government can do to reduce inequality while at the ...
  • Authors
    Tosin Durotoye
    July 31, 2019
    Tosin Durotoye is an alumna of the Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders Program 2018.  On an unremarkable day in 2015, I woke up and decided it was time to move back home. At the time, “home” was the United States where I’d spent my formative years and lived for over 20 years. However, my birth home – the home at the core of my identity and the home I would be returning to - was Nigeria. My family had immigrated to the U.S. during the Abacha era – a time of great social a ...
  • Authors
    Richard Seshie
    July 26, 2019
    Richard Seshie est un Alumni du programme des Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders 2017. Cet article a été précédemment publié ici.  Il prévaut fortement cette idée que nos pouvoirs publics ne sauraient jouer un rôle important pour les startups en Afrique. Dans plusieurs pays, leur nonchalance ou implication maladroite passée laisse dubitatif. Toutefois, c'est la nature historiquement extravertie de nos économies et ses implications qui devrait susciter plus qu' ...