Publications /
Opinion

Back
BREXIT: Why it is likely to reach an agreement to the finish
November 18, 2020

On the eve of the final negotiations on ‘‘future relations’’, an agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union (EU) seems likely.

First of all, London sees American support vanishing: unlike Donald Trump, President-elect Joe Biden is against Brexit. He announced that a USA-United Kingdom trade agreement would be ruled out if a ‘‘hard border’’ was re-established between the two Irelands. However, this is precisely what an exit without an agreement would imply: Northern Ireland would become a non-EU territory subject to customs controls for its trade with Dublin.

A trade agreement with the United States will be essential to enhance the value of Brexit. The American election is thus narrowing British room for maneuver. The signing of an agreement is all the more likely today because, even without the arrival of a new president in the United States, an exit without an agreement would have been, in reality, unlikely.

The real reason lies in the « incentives » weighing on the European Union and the United Kingdom. Both sides would lose out because of the obstacles that would suddenly disrupt their trade. After 47 years of membership, this trade has become multifaceted. Loosening such links calls for a thousand precautions. Possible with an agreement, impossible without it.

It does not matter how the damage is distributed: it would be a lose-lose outcome. In the midst of the Covid-19 crisis, public opinion would not understand.

Furthermore, London will chair two major international meetings in 2021: the G7 Summit and the Climate Conference (COP26). To make a diplomatic splash, Johnson will need American and European support.

The key point to be decoded lies in the profile of the Prime Minister. If he has displayed a close rapprochement with Trump, which has become too heavy to bear since November 3, this does not mean that the political equation of the two leaders is identical. PM Johnson is part of the British elite. As a good biographer of Churchill, he is simply making use of the « right to eccentricity » that this elite has long claimed. This right is synonymous with freedom of mind, not a refusal of reality. Johnson’s « populism » is relative: in the 2016 referendum, he only opted for Brexit at the last moment. And he was quick to acknowledge Biden’s election.

In reality, PM Johnson is the man of the « solution of a problem », the problem in which his predecessor Teresa May became entangled. The problem is this: how to make the (heavy) concessions necessary for a deal without hurting British pride?

A daunting puzzle: by leaving the European Union, London loses its say on the matter, without really getting rid of the European rules, which are key to the indispensable access to the European market. How can this ambivalent result, which does not correspond to the prospects promised by the Brexiters to the voters, be masked?

Only one method is possible: it consists in strongly promoting, vis-à-vis national public opinion, and by all means, the few concessions that London will have snatched away. At the same time, those concessions granted in return will be minimized. This method is familiar to national ministers negotiating in Brussels when they are exposed at home to the overbidding of lobbies. Johnson is familiar with the process, having been a press correspondent in Brussels. He has decided to use it on a large scale. This is his « secret ».

One tactic is to raise tension before a meeting to appear inflexible. This is what London did in 2019 with the divorce agreement, which was signed in extremis and ratified by the House of Commons by a large majority. To add spice to the exercise, threats can be agitated. The more provocative they are, the greater the media impact will be. This is how the famous plan to no longer respect “the past agreements” must be understood. The storm raised in the British Parliament, far from being an inconvenience, serves Johnson’s tactics.

The only concern is: how far to « go too far ». To avoid a break-up, we must remain realistic and discreetly let go of the necessary concessions. Because he is a populist by adoption and not by tradition, Boris Johnson is capable of doing so.

RELATED CONTENT

  • September 01, 2023
    In this podcast, we are joined by Dr. Len Ishmael, editor and co-author of the book “Aftermath of War in Europe: The West VS. the Global South?”. Dr. Ishmael delves into the groundbreakin ...
  • August 15, 2023
    يخصص مركز السياسات من أجل الجنوب الجديد حلقة برنامجه الأسبوعي "حديث الثلاثاء" لمناقشة العلاقات الروسية الافريقية في ظل النسخة الثانية من قمة روسيا – أفريقيا مع أسامة الطيبي، باحث في العلاقات الدولية بمركز السياسات من أجل الجنوب الجديد. أصبحت القمم ومنتديات التعاون الية من اليات تعزيز تو...
  • Authors
    August 4, 2023
    Twenty-Four Hours June 23-24, 2023. Over those days, Russia, the sanctioned world power, was not destabilized by the nuclear enemy in Washington, but by one man, who made his wealth serving food to school children and soldiers. A caterer who attempted a revolution. A bald man, who apparently wore wigs during his days off, as the Russian secret police claimed to have discovered when they searched his home in St Petersburg. The photos of the wig-wearing Yevgeny Prigozhin were shown o ...
  • Authors
    June 8, 2023
    A tragedy of historic proportions The war is gruesome and may not end for months or years. Not ending with the white flag of surrender, but total depletion and exhaustion, men and missiles, tanks, and terror. The battlefield is hell, as it is in all wars. A nightmare and human folly. “We are learning in Ukraine how to fight”, admitted the former President of Lithuania, Dalia Grybauskalte, “and we are learning how to use our NATO equipment. It is a teaching battle”. Yes, this politi ...
  • April 14, 2023
    Geographical proximity, historical ties, and cultural and social exchanges largely account for Italy’s enduring engagement with the Maghreb. Abdessalam Jaldi, International Relations Spec ...
  • March 24, 2023
    Dans ce nouvel épisode, Imane Lahrich accueille Abdelhak Bassou pour discuter des dessous de la présence militaire russe en Afrique. D’un côté, la Russie ambitionne de contrer les ambitio ...
  • Authors
    March 6, 2023
    En partenariat avec le Policy Center for the New South (PCNS), Africa Center est fier de présenter un rapport conjoint sur l’influence de la Russie en Afrique, une perspective sécuritaire, à l’occasion du premier anniversaire de la guerre en Ukraine. L’Afrique est apparue comme un acteur majeur de ce conflit lorsque le 3 mars 2022 , dix-sept Etats africains se sont abstenus lors du vote de la résolution de l’Assemblée générale des Nations Unies condamnant l’invasion russe en Ukrain ...
  • March 4, 2023
    In this video recorded during the Atlantic Dialogues, our Columnist Mr. Helmut Sorge interviews Ms. Ana Palacio, Spain's Former Minister of Foreign Affairs on the position of Spain and Europe towardsthe War in Ukraine, the interview also tackles different questions regarding Energy, sec...