Publications /
Opinion

Back
The World is Facing a Maddening Bottleneck
Authors
October 29, 2020

Even if a COVID-19 vaccine is developed, there is unlikely to be a quick return to normality. Dr Anthony Fauci, America’s leading expert in infectious diseases dared a prediction“We will know whether a vaccine is safe by the end of November, the beginning of December. The question is, once you have a safe and effective vaccine, or more than one, how can you get it to the people who need it as quickly as possible? You’ll have to wait several months into 2021 when you talk about vaccinating a substantial proportion of the population, so that you can have a significant impact on the dynamic of the outbreak. That very likely will not be into the second or third quarter”. Nine candidate vaccines are currently being evaluated for inclusion in the international COVAX Facility, which eventually will organize the global distribution and financing of chosen vaccines. But none of the giants, such as U.S. group Moderna (Phase III), Germany’s CureVac (Phase I), Institut Pasteur/Merck/Themis, an Austrian-American-French consortium (preclinical), or China’s Clover Biopharmaceuticals (Phase I) have confirmed that their vaccine is ready to be distributed around the globe. “Rapid responses by governments, academia and industry”, noted Nature“have already resulted in the production of more than 180 vaccine candidates, 42 of which are being tested in humans at the time of writing”.

Kate Bingham, chairwoman of the UK Vaccine Task Force told BBC Scotland that a COVID vaccine could be given to some of the most vulnerable people “this side of Christmas”, but admitted, reported the BBC, that “it was difficult to put an exact date on when normal life could resume”, but “she was hopeful that by 2022 there would be no need for people to wear face masks and was hopeful people may also go on summer holiday next year”. In June, the Wall Street Journal published some sobering news: “Frantic efforts to bring coronavirus vaccines to the world are facing a maddening bottleneck: the small glass vials that hold the shots”. Twelve to fifteen billion vaccine shots will be needed, experts believe, to cure the world, but glass manufacturers will be unable to provide the urgently needed vials, and that means, according to Business Insider France (June 8) “billions could struggle to access” the vaccine. The COVAX (COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access) Facility, comprising 172 nations coordinated by the World Health Organization, is planning by the end of 2021 to deliver two billion doses to participating countries.

‘Twelve to Fifteen Billion Vaccine Shots are Needed’

The distribution process will be “likely extremely difficult and slow for the first generation of vaccines” and the vaccination progress would take “well into 2021, and potentially 2022 or 2023”. While the coronavirus is indisputably the most pressing health issue in the world, the constant supply of packaging for other key vaccines, including meningitis, influenza, and typhoid, must be maintained—an estimated six billion vials are needed. The vials are shaped from specialized glass supplied by firms including Thermo Fisher Scientific and Schott. “There’s only 200 million vials left in the world now”, said Sir John Bell, Professor of Medicine at the University of Oxford, on the BBC Today radio program, “because they’ve all been sucked up by various people who can anticipate a vaccine”. “If we went to China now”, confirms Marc Koska, the inventor of a self-destructing syringe that helped reduce HIV transmissions, “or indeed anywhere in the world, to ask for a billion glass vials to inject everyone in Europe twice, it would be many months or years before we got supply. That has become the weak link in this whole supply chain”.

It is not only the lack of glass that will slow global distribution. Vaccines have to be transported and stored, at times in Arctic temperatures. The German government decided to open 60 storage and distribution centers all over the country. The question is urgent: how do companies and health agencies get vaccines to the people, many without access to electricity and freezers? Anna Nagurney, Professor of Operations Management at the University of Massachusetts, wrote in The Conversation (September 18)“The answer is something called the vaccine cold chain—a supply chain that can keep vaccines in tightly controlled temperatures from the moment they are made to the moment they are admitted to a person”. Ultimately hundreds of millions of people in the United States and billions globally are going to need the coronavirus vaccine—and potentially two doses of it. The mass vaccination effort is going to require a complex vaccine cold chain on a scale never seen before. The current vaccine cold chain is not up to the task and expanding the supply chain is not going to be easy. The cold chain, noted the professor, “requires three major pieces of infrastructure: planes, trucks, and cold storage warehouses … Different vaccines may require different temperatures and different handling procedures”. Nagurney added that, “Most vaccines need to be stored within 1 degree Fahrenheit of their ideal temperature. Traditionally vaccines are usually stored between 35 degrees Fahrenheit and 46 degrees Fahrenheit, but some of the leading COVID 19 vaccines need to be stored at much colder temperatures … mistakes are mostly due to inappropriate shipping procedures in the cold chain, and these losses are estimated at $34.1 billion annually”. She continued: “Several major logistic companies, as UPS and DHL are investing in new storage facilities for cold chain management. UPS is adding freezer farms of 600 freezers capable of reaching minus 80 degrees Celsius near UPS air hubs in Louisville, Kentucky, and the Netherlands. Each freezer will be able to hold 48,000 vials of vaccines”. All of these investments, the ordering of vials or creation of freezer parks, are made before any vaccine has been finalized, meaning pharmaceutical groups and governments risk billions of dollars.

 

The opinions expressed in this article belongs to the author.

RELATED CONTENT

  • February 8, 2022
    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the “war on drugs” by President Richard Nixon. Since then, law-enforcement responses are primarily used to counter the production, trafficking and consumption of illegal drugs. The international control regime based on the prohi...
  • February 8, 2022
    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the “war on drugs” by President Richard Nixon. Since then, law-enforcement responses are primarily used to counter the production, trafficking and consumption of illegal drugs. The international control regime based on the prohi...
  • February 8, 2022
    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the “war on drugs” by President Richard Nixon. Since then, law-enforcement responses are primarily used to counter the production, trafficking and consumption of illegal drugs. The international control regime based on the prohi...
  • Authors
    February 3, 2022
    His message was one of reassurance, just as a great leader has to react in a crisis. The concerns about Covid 19 was nothing but “a frenzy and psychosis”. The President knew the secret to defeat the virus: vodka, sauna, tractor. Didn’t a US president named Donald Trump suggest  that toilet cleaning disinfectants chase the virus out of infected lungs on national television? (New York Times, April 24, 2020) That was Trump-speak, sure, but the man who uttered the tractor/vodka/nonsense ...
  • Authors
    February 3, 2022
    COVID-19 has ravaged nearly every country in the world, with the globalization of recent decades intensifying its spread. As of mid-2021, the world had spent $16.5 trillion—18% of global GDP—to fight the disease. And that amount does not even include the most important losses such as deaths, mental health effects, restrictions on human freedom, and other nonmonetary suffering. Nearly 90% of this spending was by developed economies, with the rest by emerging market and developing eco ...
  • Authors
    January 26, 2022
    COVID-19 has caused serious damage throughout the entire world. As of mid-2021, the global fiscal cost of COVID-19—excluding the most important consequences, such as human lives, mental health effects, restrictions of human freedom, and other non-pecuniary components, have amounted to at least $16.5 trillion, about 18% of world GDP (Dinh 2021). Financial support has varied across countries depending on income level, political willingness, and the extent of the pandemic in each econo ...
  • Authors
    December 29, 2021
    Après une longue période de prix atones, le café a vu ses cours se raffermir au cours de l’année 2020 et du premier trimestre 2021, avant de flamber durant l’été et l’automne. Il renouait alors avec des plus hauts niveaux depuis 2011, date de la fin du dernier « super-cycle des matières premières (2002-2011). Tandis que la demande progresse structurellement, l’offre s’est repliée, pénalisée par une conjonction de facteurs climatiques, géopolitiques et, bien évidemment, sanitaires en ...
  • Authors
    Gerson Javier Pérez Valbuena
    Diana Ricciulli
    Jaime Bonet
    Inácio Araújo
    Fernando Perobelli
    December 28, 2021
    This paper analyses the regional economic differences in the impact of lockdown measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 ordered by Colombia’s national gov­ernment. Using an input-output model, we estimate regional economic losses by extracting a group of formal and informal workers from different sectors of the economy. Results show regional differences in the impact of lockdown measures on their labour markets, local economies, and productive sectors. We also find that periphera ...
  • December 15, 2021
    Since its emergence, the new coronavirus has continued to bring many uncertainties, whether in terms of health aspects, policy measures or social and economic consequences. If there is, however, one certainty in this Covid-19 era, it is that the pandemic is a turning point in human hist...
  • Authors
    December 6, 2021
    Between January 2020 and June 2021, the world spent about US $16.5 trillion (18% of world GDP) to fight COVID-19, and this amount does not even include the most important losses such as deaths, mental health effects, restrictions on human freedom, and other nonmonetary suffering. Nearly 90% of this amount was spent by developed economies; the rest by emerging market and developing economies. Low-income countries spent just US $12.5 billion, or less than 0.0001% of the total. Moreove ...