Publications /
Opinion

Back
The Trouble With Gulf Patrols
Authors
Joseph Hammond
September 17, 2019

The author is an alumnus of theAtlantic Dialogues Emeging Leaders Program 2018.

In the strategic waters near the straights of Hormuz in many ways such it’s the 1980s all over again. Recent mine attacks on maritime traffic and the capture of multiple vessels by Iran harks back to the so-called “Tanker War.”

A nested conflict within the larger Iran-Iraq War the “Tanker War” involved American warships escorting oil tanker traffic through the Straights of Hormuz despite Iranian interdiction efforts. The mission ultimately led to a significant naval battle in 1988 and a decisive defeat of the Iranian navy.

The United Kingdom currently has two warships providing escort to its vessels in the region after Iranian forces captured the United Kingdom flagged maritime transit vessel while the U.S. is keen to launch its mission in the Gulf known as Operation Sentinel many in the United Kingdom and beyond feel that such a task force could lead to a heightening not reduction of tensions. 

In a nod to such concerns, the Trump Administration has implied that U.S. forces will mainly take on a supporting role regarding Operation Sentinel. This week Bahrain announced it will join the American patrol mission. The strategically located nation is home to both British and American military installations.

However, several countries in Europe seem hesitant about the idea, especially Germany, which means that despite U.S. lobbying in June, the freedom of navigation mission will fall outside the NATO framework. Under the government of former British Prime Minister Theresa May, the United Kingdom sought an EU patrol mission and received support for this from several EU member states. However, the current the British government has said that working with the United States military given its capacity will be unavoidable.

Conversely, it may be that expanded capacity, which has played a role in the current crisis. On May 5th in an unusual statement White House National Security Advisor John Bolton stated “that any attack on the United States interests or those of our allies will be met with unrelenting force,” and a previously scheduled deployment of an aircraft carrier was hurried to the Gulf.

Iranian actions have thus far called Bolton’s bluff with its recent provocative actions. President Trump called off airstrikes on Iran in late May and referred to attacks on maritime traffic in the Gulf as attacks as “very minor.” Such ambiguity allows for both sides to sleep-walk into conflict.

Furthermore, Germany has flatly stated it will not take part in any U.S. led mission – another reason that the United Kingdom has continued to support an alternative EU led mission. China and Russia may also take part. In addition to Bahrain it seems that Australia and possibly Poland may agree to join the mission.

Iranian attacks on maritime shipping is a serious threat to global stability. A successful attack on an oil tanker could result in a spike in oil prices around the globe. The international community should overcome its differences to ensure the continued stability not only of global oil supply but, of the broader Middle East. This time international naval patrols maybe "nested" within a larger Iranian-Saudi rivalry in the region but, such patrols may be the best way to avoid regional competition hatching into a regional war.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    August 12, 2026
    When a crisis erupts, it sets crisis-management reflexes in motion and prompts efforts to contain its effects. Analysts then begin looking for the malfunctions, oversights, and failures that caused it. In some cases, conspiracy theories creep in, and speculation turns to who engineered the crisis, and to what end. Crisis-management theory teaches us, however, that a crisis unfolds under conditions that favor its emergence. Crises take shape in an environment where latent vulnerabil ...
  • Authors
    August 11, 2026
    Lorsqu’une crise éclate, elle donne lieu à l’actionnement des réflexes pour sa gestion et la limitation de ses effets. Commencent, alors, les analyses et les suppositions sur les dysfonctionnements, les manquements et les défaillances ayant entrainé ladite crise. Dans certains cas, la théorie du complot s’ingère et les hypothèses cherchent les auteurs ayant provoqué la crise, leurs desseins et leurs buts.Cependant, la théorie de gestion des crises nous apprend qu’une crise inte ...
  • Authors
    August 11, 2026
    The Mecca Agreement: A First Step Towards a New Regional Security Architecture? On 7 August, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and Pakistan signed the Mecca Agreement, a trilateral defense pact aimed at strengthening collective security and defense cooperation between the three countries. At its core lies a collective defense commitment under which an attack on one member is considered an attack on all three. While many details concerning its practical implementation remain unclear, the agreeme ...
  • Authors
    August 7, 2026
    THE END OF AN ERAThe US-Israeli war on Iran, a 'little excursion' envisaged to be over within a matter of weeks, has entered its fourth month. Shock waves ripple across the globe. This war is just one in a series of recent crises which have fractured the international community, making the decades of the 2020's among the most disruptive in recent history. Each crisis compounds the deleterious effects of those which came before. The war in Iran is no exception. It abruptly stalled ec ...
  • Authors
    August 6, 2026
    With America's 250th anniversary, there will be many analyses of the country's history from domestic and international perspectives. But the meaning of the American story should also be assessed in key regional settings, from Asia to Latin America, and in transatlantic terms. In this vein, it is worth exploring the U.S. engagement in and with the Mediterranean world, one of the first places of U.S. international activism, and a setting where diverse aspects of U.S. foreign policy ha ...
  • Authors
    July 17, 2026
    The close relationship between energy and geopolitics is well established. The same holds true for several armed conflicts. In recent years, however, the conflict most closely intertwined with energy has been the 2026 Iran War, which began on February 28. A ceasefire has been in effect since April 8, and a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed by Iran and the United States on June 17. Nevertheless, as demonstrated by Iran's attacks on commercial vessels and recent U.S. strike ...
  • Authors
    July 17, 2026
    Les relations, très étroites, entre l’énergie et la géopolitique sont bien connues. Cela vaut aussi pour plusieurs conflits armés. Mais, dans la période récente, le conflit le plus lié à l’énergie est la guerre d’Iran de 2026, qui a débuté le 28 février. Un cessez-le-feu est en vigueur depuis le 8 avril et un protocole d’accord a été signé le 17 juin par l’Iran et les États-Unis. Mais, comme le montrent les attaques de l’Iran contre des navires et les frappes américaines de ces dern ...
  • Authors
    July 9, 2026
    Cet essai analyse la guerre Iran–États-Unis–Israël de 2026 comme un révélateur de la transformation profonde de l’ordre international. À travers le prisme du droit de la mer, du détroit d’Ormuz, des alliances fragmentées, des câbles sous-marins et des flux énergétiques, il montre que le pouvoir mondial se déplace progressivement du contrôle des territoires vers la maîtrise des infrastructures de circulation. Loin de disparaître, la mondialisation entre dans une phase de connectivité ...