Publications /
Policy Paper

Back
Global Imbalances and Geopolitical Fragmentation
Authors
Diogo Ramos Coelho
Bruno Saraiva
June 22, 2026

Global imbalances are back—and this time the risks look different. The 2008 financial crisis showed how persistent current-account deficits and surpluses between major economies can fuel financial instability and trigger sudden, severe reversals of capital flows. After almost two decades, many thought that episode had been resolved. It had not. New imbalances have built up, with a familiar cast: China, Germany, Japan, and oil exporters running large surpluses, and the United States absorbing the rest of the world's savings. But the underlying dynamics have shifted in ways that make the current situation harder to read and potentially harder to unwind. This paper traces those shifts and asks whether the world is better or worse placed to manage them this time around.

The situation today is not simply the result of trade imbalances or unfair competition. It reflects the structural role of the U.S. as the world's balance-sheet absorber of last resort—a country with assets that everyone wants to hold, regardless of what tariffs or exchange rates do. That role comes with new vulnerabilities: persistent global demand for dollar-denominated safe assets, soaring public U.S. debt, equity markets concentrated in a handful of technology firms, and a financial system increasingly reliant on non-bank intermediaries. Fixing this would require coordinated action involving fiscal adjustment in the United States, stronger domestic demand in China, and deeper financial integration in Europe. What is missing is the political will to act, at a moment when geopolitical fragmentation and strategic rivalry make international cooperation harder than ever. The 2008 crisis was not the last word on global imbalances. It may have been the rehearsal.

 

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    September 3, 2025
    Estimates based on last year’s U.S. imports, by Maia G. Crook (from JPMorgan) indicate that the average effective U.S. tariff rate is currently 16%, and is expected to rise to 20% by the end of 2025. This represents an increase from 13% mid-year and 2.3% in 2024 (Figure 1). Effective tariff rates are a measure of the degree of protection a tariff structure offers to the value added provided by each sector to a country’s final product, taking into account both the tax on final g ...
  • Authors
    August 4, 2025
    An Executive Order issued on July 30 by President Donald Trump hiked United States tariffs on imports from Brazil by 40%, in addition to the 10% established on April 2—the so-called ‘Liberation Day’ when Trump set out ‘reciprocal tariffs’ on countries around the world.The decree came with a long list of exemptions for Brazilian exports. For a number of product lines, the 10% April 2 tariff will continue to apply. These include air transport equipment, orange juice, furniture, fuel, ...
  • June 23, 2025
    President Donald Trump's "Reciprocal Tariff" policy, announced on April 2, 2025 (dubbed "Liberation Day"), represents one of the most significant shifts in U.S. trade policy in nearly a century. Trump’s policy imposes a baseline 10% tariff on all imports and additional country-specific tariffs that range from 10% to 50% for countries designated as having "non-reciprocal trading practices" with the U.S. These specific tariffs are determined based on each country’s bilateral trade bal ...
  • May 6, 2025
    في بداية شهر أبريل، أعلن الرئيس الأمريكي دونالد ترامب عن سلسلة من الإجراءات التجارية الجديدة، أبرزها فرض رسوم جمركية بنسبة 10% على معظم الواردات الأمريكية، مع زيادات تصل إلى 145% على بعض المنتجات القادمة من دول محددة، خاصة الصين. هذه القرارات أثارت مخاوف واسعة في الأوساط الاقتصادية بشأن...
  • Authors
    May 5, 2025
    Last week marked my twenty-third consecutive week attending the World Bank and IMF Spring Meetings in Washington, DC. While I no longer participate in the official sessions, I continue to be invited to the many side conventions and debates that surround them.A key moment is always the release of the IMF's World Economic Outlook report. This year, it drew particular attention due to curiosity about how the institution would project the impacts of the tariff war initiated by Trump’s s ...
  • April 29, 2025
    At the recent World Bank and IMF Spring Meetings, heightened attention focused on the IMF’s downgraded global economic forecasts. Global growth is now projected at 2.8% for 2025 and 3% for 2026, down from 3.3% in 2024, largely due to rising trade barriers initiated by Mr. Trump’s second...
  • April 23, 2025
    The United States is at a critical juncture, facing a pivotal dilemma: preserving global leadership in a world it no longer fully controls. While it proclaims its primacy in the liberal international order, its actions tell a different story—one marked by tariffs, reshoring policies, and an open attempt to contain China’s rise. This strategy is driven less by long-term vision than domestic political calculus, underscoring the urgent need for strategic recalibration. ...
  • April 11, 2025
    Dans cet épisode, nous décryptons le retour en force du protectionnisme américain, incarné par Donald Trump à l'occasion de son second mandat, à travers sa stratégie "America First". Nous ...
  • April 10, 2025
      Marcus Vinicius De Freitas Professor, China Foreign Affairs University Senior Fellow, Policy Center for the New South The Chinese government’s white paper, ‘China’s Position on Some Issues Concerning China-US Economic and Trade Relations,[1]’ issued on April 9, 2025, in response to the escalating tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, is not just a diplomatic response to the escalating tensions with the United States. It is a meticulously crafted strategic document th ...