Publications /
Policy Brief

Back
The New South: breaking with the past - West-South engagement in a changing world
Authors
July 26, 2024

This paper was originally published in idos-research.de

 

The early 1960s can be regarded as the “Big Bang” for international cooperation and development policy. The US was pushing an international system to support developing countries, and in 1961, it established the US Agency for International Development (USAID). The same year saw the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) set up its Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Germany’s post-WWII engagement in international development cooperation took an institutional shape with the founding of the Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) also in 1961. Shortly after, in March 1964, the German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS, formerly German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE)) was created with the mandate to train practitioners and post-graduates to work in the new field of development policy and offer research-based advice to the field of international cooperation.

Today, 60 years later, we look back at six decades of research, policy advice, training, knowledge, cooperation and joint learning, with the constant aim of finding innovative and implementation-oriented solutions to current development challenges. The focus of our work is on the interdependence of “development” and “sustainability” and the system of international cooperation itself, in the context of geopolitical shifts. Decent living worldwide and for all social groups is only possible today and in the future if planetary boundaries are adhered to, that is, if political, economic and social development is accompanied by the protection of biodiversity, soils, water and oceans and a radical reduction of climate-damaging emissions is achieved. This requires the climate-stabilizing transformation of production systems and consumption behavior in countries of all income groups, but with targeted support for low- and middle-income countries. It is about envisioning, designing and implementing pathways into sustainable futures around the globe. A reformed, rule-based international order needs to address double-standards and ensure that rules of the game apply to all. Such an order must be based on the recognition of human rights and international law and constructive multilateral cooperation in a multipolar world.

Len Ishmael, in her keynote at IDOS’ 60th anniversary event, addresses these challenges of shaping futures by reflecting on the state of our world and world order today, determining how and by whom futures are being negotiated. She argues that our world is standing at a crossroads. The “New South” is re-considering its identity, aware of its increasing agency, and pursuing alliances that support the New South’s “emergence”. Her assessment is clear: the “Old North” must boost its attractiveness to countries in what she calls the New South if it wants to be considered an important player in upcoming future-making. This seeking of alliances with the New South is not about giving up “Northern” interests or values; instead, it is about shaping reciprocal, trusted partnerships in areas of joint interest and respecting one another’s differences.

Len Ishmael’s keynote “The New South: Breaking with Past: West-South Engagement in a Changing World” is a must-read for all those reflecting on the state of the world today and with the ambition to co-shape its future in a collaborative and constructive manner. (Foreword by Anna-Katharina Hornidge)

RELATED CONTENT

  • November 13, 2026
    La réunion de l’Assemblée générale du 10 novembre 2026, convoquée à la suite du veto russe opposé le 30 octobre au projet de résolution américain sur le Sahara, constitue une nouvelle illustration de la volonté des États membres des Nations Unies de renforcer la transparence et la responsabilité politique des membres permanents du Conseil de sécurité. Sans remettre en cause le droit de veto ni modifier les règles de fonctionnement du Conseil, ce mécanisme impose que son exercice don ...
  • Authors
    Paul Isbell
    November 12, 2026
    In this policy paper – Part 3 of our ongoing analysis – we address the Iran War and its implications for the evolution of the international system in its denouement from the clash between “Restoration”, on the one hand, and “Reformation” or “Revolution”, on the other (see our previous policy paper for a summary and analysis of Andrey Kortunov’s scenarios for the future of the international system). These rival global dynamics are faced off in this moment across the Strait of Hormuz ...
  • November 12, 2026
    The U.S. midterm elections raise questions about the future direction of American foreign policy and its implications for Africa. This discussion examines how shifting political dynamics in Washington could shape the Trump administration’s foreign policy priorities and engagement with t...
  • Authors
    Giovanna Rinaldo
    November 4, 2026
    Brazil’s presidential election, which concluded on October 25, 2026, was above all a digital battle. This is nothing new; the impact of social media on elections has been widely analyzed since Barack Obama's 2008 win marked a turning point for digital campaigning worldwide. Almost two decades later, social media is an entirely different breed, with a life of its own – and still very little regulation within electoral politics. The danger, however, is that digital players now also in ...
  • November 4, 2026
    Le 30 octobre 2026, le mandat de la Minurso a expiré et n’a pas été renouvelé. La raison : un projet américain, pourtant appuyé par 11 membres du Conseil de sécurité, auquel la Russie a opposé son veto, suivi d’un projet russe qui n’a pu recueillir que trois voix en sa faveur, sur lequel les États-Unis ont émis un vote négatif.Cette impasse révèle deux conceptions opposées du règlement. Washington entend recentrer le processus sur l’initiative marocaine d’autonomie et adapter progre ...
  • October 29, 2026
    Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s victory brings to an end one of the most closely contested elections in Brazil’s recent history. Before any broader analysis, however, a qualification is necessary. Supreme Court Justice Cristiano Zanin’s controversial decision to extend voting hours sparked debate over the electoral process. Although the measure was not mathematically decisive in Lula’s come-from-behind victory, the episode risks fuelling challenges to the result and further eroding poli ...
  • Authors
    October 29, 2026
    Wars are decided by those who hold military power, but their costs are increasingly borne by those who have little or no voice in the decisions that start them. The US–Iran war shows this imbalance very clearly. Its economic consequences have gone far beyond the battlefield and have disrupted energy markets, trade routes, food supplies, public finances and investment in the Gulf, Europe, Africa and Asia. The most striking feature of the conflict, however, is not only the size of the ...