Publications /
Research Paper

Back
China’s Services Transformation and the Local Services Trap
Authors
July 13, 2026

This paper examines the evolution of China’s services sector between 2012 and 2022, analyzing the country’s structural transformation based on a novel three-tier taxonomy: knowledge services (KS), enabling services (ES), and local services (LS). Using sixteen quantitative indicators from OECD databases, the study evaluates China’s transition in comparison to the EU15 benchmark, highlighting three core challenges: manufacturing rebalancing, labor absorption, and global integration.

Three primary findings emerge. First, while manufacturing’s share of GDP in China has stabilized at approximately 29% due to active industrial policy, manufacturing employment has decoupled from output as automation has reduced labor intensity. Second, the services sector has absorbed this released labor, but the composition is problematic: local services (LS) have absorbed the bulk of new jobs at low productivity levels, while high-productivity gains in enabling services (ES) have generated limited direct employment. Knowledge services (KS) remain dynamic but are currently too small and skill-constrained to serve as a primary growth engine. Third, China’s external posture has shifted toward an ‘inward turn’ in direct services exports, countered by a strengthening indirect upstream channel via which producer services are increasingly embedded in other countries’ exports.

The paper concludes that China faces a critical productivity/employment trade-off: a transition dominated by local services preserves social stability through job creation, but risks a structural ceiling on aggregate growth. Successful rebalancing will require resolving the structural conditions—specifically skill availability, geographic matching, and openness to foreign inputs—necessary to scale high-productivity knowledge services.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    February 10, 2015
    Manufacturing is declining as a share of GDP not only in advanced countries, but in developing countries as well. This new trend, a result of complex forces, should be seen on balance as a reason for development-optimism, not pessimism. In the 21st century economy, manufacturing remains important, but poor countries can attract investment, grow rapidly and diversify away from agriculture on the basis of many possible sources of comparative advantage, without artificially promoting m ...