Publications /
Opinion

Back
Deep-Sea Mining and Ocean Governance at a Crossroads
Authors
Eduarda Zoghbi
July 4, 2025

It is no longer news that critical minerals are becoming increasingly important for global supply chains, and are essential to the energy transition. Countries are racing to secure mining rights in the Global South, and to expand refining capacity within their borders, but few have been paying attention to a new frontier for mineral extraction—the deep sea. The issue has flown under the radar, in part because of its controversial and sensitive nature.

On April 24, however, President Trump issued an Executive Order (EO), declaring that “the United States has a core national security and economic interest in maintaining leadership in deep sea science and technology and seabed mineral resources”. The EO promotes the responsible development of seabed minerals, and calls for the acceleration of extraction and processing technologies to secure supply chains for defense, infrastructure, and, notably, the energy sector. It also proposes a fast-tracked licensing process and a seabed mapping initiative to position the U.S. as a global leader in seabed mineral exploration and innovation.

Another of President Trump’s goals is to reduce dependence on foreign suppliers—particularly China—and boost U.S. competitiveness. To that end, the EO includes a politically sensitive provision that allows for exploration licenses not only in U.S. waters but also in “areas beyond national jurisdiction”.

In 1982, the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), a legal framework regulating oceans and marine resources. It led to the creation of the International Seabed Authority (ISA), tasked with overseeing mining in areas beyond national jurisdiction. For decades, ISA member states have struggled to reach agree rules to govern this emerging industry. While most countries have ratified UNCLOS, the U.S. has remained an exception, which may now justify its own regulatory path and, arguably, to sidestep multilateral governance.

Governments, scientists, and environmental organizations argue that the EO is a unilateral move that undermines ISA’s authority. Letícia Reis de Carvalho, ISA’s Secretary-General, responded with a letter raising concerns about the EO’s applicability in areas beyond national jurisdiction. She said that the EO contradicts the UNCLOS framework, which stipulates that mineral activities in international waters must be conducted under ISA’s oversight, with equitable benefit-sharing and strong environmental protections. UNCLOS asserts that no state has the right to exploit deep-sea minerals unilaterally—a norm that is understood to be binding even on countries that haven't ratified the treaty.

De Carvalho also expressed surprise since the U.S. has historically played a constructive role in ISA negotiations, offering technical expertise to shape new regulatory frameworks. However, the decision to mine beyond national jurisdiction disregards the principle that international waters are a common heritage of humankind. Trump’s EO could therefore compromise decades of negotiations and set a dangerous precedent that could destabilize the entire system of global ocean governance.

While the crisis over ocean governance rights unfolds, Pacific Island nations are also asserting their sovereignty and influence. Some countries are advancing domestic regulations on deep-sea mining, while others continue to uphold indigenous stewardship and their longstanding commitments to protecting ocean biodiversity. Meanwhile, the EO could create incentives for countries with seabed minerals to partner with Washington, reshaping how these nations protect their environmental heritage.

Whether deep-sea mining will create a positive or negative effect for the ocean’s ecosystem is also being contested. Critics of deep-sea mining argue that only 5% of the ocean has been explored, leaving the remaining 95% as a vast, unknown ecosystem. Jeff Watters, vice president for external affairs at Ocean Conservancy, notes that there is consensus among scientists that the long-term risks outweigh the short-term economic benefits. The damage wouldn’t be confined to the ocean floor—it would impact the entire water column, and by extension, all life that depends on it.

A recent BBC article highlighted a paper from the UK’s Natural History Museum and the National Oceanography Centre, which has monitored the effects of experimental seabed mining since the 1970s. While some sediment-dwelling creatures were able to recolonize the site and recover from the test, larger animals appeared not to have returned. Scientists emphasized that polymetallic nodules collected from the seabed take millions of years to form and cannot be replaced.

In contrast, mining companies claim the environmental concerns are exaggerated. In interviews with CNN, several CEOs argued that their research proves the viability of their operations. They acknowledged it’s not a zero-impact endeavor, but claimed that ocean mining causes less harm than land mining, which often involves deforestation and illegal labor exploitation. Opposing groups fear that ocean mining will not reduce land mining, and instead, will potentially create a new frontier of devastation.

This geopolitical conundrum illustrates a classic case of the prisoner’s dilemma. In other words, while international cooperation would benefit all by ensuring long-term ecological preservation and equitable access to marine resources, the temptation for unilateral action—in pursuit of short-term national interests—can influence even historically cooperative states. This is precisely the risk posed by Trump’s EO: it signals a shift to self-interest, encouraging others to follow, rather than uphold shared governance. Abandoning multilateralism in favor of unilateral gain is dangerous for ocean governance, especially as climate change continues to destabilize marine ecosystems. Just as in game theory, the dominant strategy for individual players may lead to a collectively suboptimal outcome, that would jeopardize not only biodiversity, but the climate commitments on which our shared future depends.

RELATED CONTENT

  • Authors
    Eduarda Zoghbi
    July 4, 2025
    It is no longer news that critical minerals are becoming increasingly important for global supply chains, and are essential to the energy transition. Countries are racing to secure mining rights in the Global South, and to expand refining capacity within their borders, but few have been paying attention to a new frontier for mineral extraction—the deep sea. The issue has flown under the radar, in part because of its controversial and sensitive nature. ...
  • July 4, 2025
    Tensions are rising in the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial oil route, as Iran clashes with its rivals, fueling fears that conflict could spill into vital shipping lanes. Missile attacks and military threats risk disrupting global energy supplies and sending prices soaring, with consequences...
  • Authors
    Loubna Eddallal
    June 4, 2025
    Longtemps considéré comme le géant pétrolier du continent, le Nigeria entame un nouveau chapitre énergétique marqué par une transition stratégique vers le gaz. Avec des réserves prouvées dépassant les 210 000 milliards de pieds cubes, le pays est en passe de devenir le principal producteur et exportateur de gaz en Afrique. L’initiative présidentielle Décennie du Gaz, lancée en 2021 par le président Muhammadu Buhari, constitue le cadre officiel de cette transformation. Elle vise à di ...
  • May 30, 2025
    In this podcast, Ms. Bamise Olanrewaju, Director of the Energy Infrastructure Cluster in Nigeria Energy Forum, explores the strategic role of natural gas in advancing development across t ...
  • Authors
    Loubna Eddallal
    May 29, 2025
    Nigeria, long regarded as Africa’s oil powerhouse, is entering a new energy chapter, driven by the country’s strategic shift towards becoming the leading gas economy in the continent. With proven reserves exceeding 210 trillion cubic feet, Nigeria is set to emerge as Africa’s foremost gas producer and exporter. The government’s Decade of Gas Initiative, launched in 2021 by President Muhammadu Bihari, constitutes the official framework for this transition, which aims to diversify the ...
  • May 27, 2025
    Cette étude est consacrée à la désalinisation de l’eau de mer, aux barrages et aux autoroutes de l’eau au Maroc, solutions innovantes privilégiées par Sa Majesté le roi Mohammed VI, notamment dans son discours du 29 juillet 2024 marquant le 25ème anniversaire de son accession au Trône. Discours dans lequel le Souverain rappelait que l’un des défis majeurs auquel le Royaume était confronté était celui d’un stress hydrique structurel et récurrent.L’analyse de 26 Stations de ...
  • Authors
    May 12, 2025
    On April 17, 2025, British oil and gas giant BP announced the export of the first cargo of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from offshore resources shared by Senegal and Mauritania. For the first time in their history, both countries have become LNG exporters. This milestone follows a series of pivotal developments in the region’s hydrocarbon sector. In late December 2024, offshore gas production began. By February 2025, LNG production had commenced. Earlier still, in June 2024, Senegal ...
  • Authors
    May 6, 2025
    Le 17 avril 2025, le géant britannique BP a annoncé qu’une première cargaison de gaz naturel liquéfié (GNL) avait été exportée à partir de ressources gazières exploitées au large du Sénégal et de la Mauritanie. Ces deux pays sont devenus, pour la première fois dans leur histoire, des exportateurs de GNL. Précédemment, il y avait eu trois autres dates particulièrement marquantes dans la valorisation des hydrocarbures dans cette zone. Fin décembre 2024, la production de gaz naturel of ...
  • May 2, 2025
    This Opinion was originally published in Project Syndicate As the US-China rivalry intensifies, both powers are courting mineral-rich African countries in an effort to secure critical raw materials. Translating Africa's vast natural-resource wealth into lasting development requires an infrastructure-led strategy that delivers long-term value for local communities. ...
  • April 22, 2025
    في ظل التحديات المناخية المتزايدة، تبرز مقاربة "نكسوس" التي تربط بين الماء والطاقة والغذاء كخيار استراتيجي لا مفر منه. ورغم أهميتها، ما تزال مقيدَة في المغرب بعوائق بنيوية ومؤسساتية تحول دون تفعيلها الفعلي. كيف يمكن تجاوز هذه الإشكاليات؟ وما هي سبل إشراك القطاع الخاص لبناء شراكات تدعم ا...