Publications /
Opinion

Back
The American People, Not Vladimir Putin Should Decide Who is President of the United States
Authors
September 28, 2020

Bank robbers are now and then caught because banks, insurance companies, or robbed personalities promise rewards for the arrest of criminals. In the past, Hollywood took the lead in dreaming up such scenarios. But in early August, the U.S. State Department offered a $10 million reward for information leading “to the identification or location of any person, who works with or for a foreign government for the purpose of interfering with U.S. elections through certain illegal cyber activities”.

Washington’s intelligence services are certain that foreign forces, presumably located in St. Petersburg, Tehran, Beijing, or Pyongyang, are once again preparing mischief in the electoral process. The troll armies and Putin bots are ready to confuse American society even further, disseminating disinformation and propaganda via Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and spreading fake news, rumors, exaggerations, and inventions. “Putin is presumably deciding now how far to go in interfering in the 2020 election”, declared David Shimer, U.S. historian and author of Rigged: America, Russia and One Hundred Years of Covert Electoral Interference, a study of Russian and American efforts to influence elections around the world.

As November draws near, “foreign interference is already present in this year’s elections,” according to The Verge (August 5). U.S. tech giant Microsoft informed the campaign of Joe Biden, according to Foreign Policy (September 11) that it “may have been the target of a suspected hacking attempt by Russian backed state actors, demonstrating Moscow’s continued efforts to interfere in and influence U.S. elections. Hackers reportedly targeted staffers of the prominent campaign strategy and communications firm SKDKnickerbocker, which has worked on the campaign of several past Presidential candidates and is currently taking a lead role in supporting Biden’s run. Sources told the news agency “Reuters” that they had been trying to break into the firm’s networks for the past two months, but they appear to have failed to breach SKDK’s security… The U.S. Treasury Department also sanctioned four people accused of trying to interfere in the elections on behalf of Russia. One is a member of the Ukrainian parliament, while the other three are Russian nationals employed by Russia’s Internet Research Agency, which was heavily involved in Moscow’s influence campaign during the 2016 Presidential elections”.

‘Terrifying Foreign Threat’

In late July, William Evanina, director of the U.S. National Counterintelligence and Security Center, told members of Congress that Moscow was working, as in 2016, to boost the campaign of Donald Trump and undermine that of Joe Biden, the Democrats’ Presidential candidate: “We assess that Russia is using a range of measures to primarily denigrate former Vice President Biden and what it sees as an anti-Russian establishment”. Mr. Evanina confirmed that Russia is using social media and many other tools to inflame social divisions, promote conspiracy theories, and to sow distrust. Classified briefings on the foreign meddling, stated Richard Blumenthal, U.S. Senator from Connecticut, “have been absolutely chilling, and frankly, terrifying in the magnitude of foreign threat to our election security that we face. It really is a break-the-glass moment”. Majority leader Mitch McConnell confirmed the “significant threat” posed by Moscow, but considered it “a serious mistake” to ignore China and Iran.

President Trump himself may be the only person still unconvinced. In his memoir, The Room Where it Happened, Trump’s former National Security Advisor, John Bolton, stated: “Trump remained, as he had been from the beginning, unwilling or unable to admit any Russian meddling because he believed doing so would undercut the legitimacy of his election and the narrative of the ‘witch hunt’ against him”.  Historian David Shimer warned that “leaders like Putin push as far as they can without provoking meaningful pushback and in that sense, Trump’s continued passivity towards Russia could embolden Putin to proceed more aggressively”. Unless someone brave or desperate in St. Petersburg or Beijing is tempted by the bounty of $10 million, the 2020 U.S. Presidential election could see manipulation and a historical meltdown, suggesting a failing democracy.

The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author.

RELATED CONTENT

  • October 3, 2024
    This episode explores the potential effects of the 2024 U.S. elections on Africa, focusing on U.S. foreign policy, economic relations, and security cooperation. It examines key issues like shifts in U.S. strategies towards Africa, particularly in response to growing Chinese and Russian ...
  • Authors
    September 27, 2024
    This paper examines the implications of the U.S.-China trade war for developing countries, particularly in light of the 2024 U.S. presidential election. The study traces the origins and escalation of the trade conflict, analyzing its multiple impacts on global trade patterns and economic growth. While some developing countries have benefited from trade diversion and supply-chain shifts, others, especially resource-exporting nations and the least-developed countries, have faced signi ...
  • Authors
    Kassie Freeman
    September 23, 2024
    The 2024 Presidential election in the United States will be historic and consequential. Both candidates are history-making in different ways. Democratic nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris, is the first woman of African and Asian descent to become the Democratic Party’s nominee, while President Trump won his party’s nomination without participating in any Republic Primary debates. Even more strikingly different are their parties’ platforms—what they would do if elected. However, i ...
  • Authors
    Driss Alaoui Belghiti
    September 5, 2024
    Les élections présidentielles américaines de 2024 se déroulent dans un contexte de polarisation politique marquée, qui reflète les divisions idéologiques et sociales au sein de la société américaine. Ce phénomène résulte de diverses dynamiques structurelles, telles que le ‘’gerrymandering’’, l'évolution des médias, l'essor des réseaux sociaux, et un système de financement des campagnes électorales dominé par de grands donateurs. Ces facteurs ont contribué à redéfinir le paysage poli ...
  • Authors
    September 5, 2024
    In November, U.S. voters will decide who will take control of the White House, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, and their political parties differ significantly on key economic policy proposals that will heavily impact the economy of the country and, therefore, the world. Here, we examine examples in the fields of trade, tax, energy, and immigration. On trade, although the Democrat administration of President Joe Biden has not been a bastio ...
  • Authors
    Nizar Messari
    June 4, 2024
    On June 2, 2024, Mexico held the biggest election in its history. Over 97 million eligible voters elected 20,375 federal officers, including the president, all 500 members of the Chamber of Deputies (the lower legislative chamber), and the 128 members of the Senate (the higher legislative chamber). Moreover, for the first time in Mexico’s history, the top candidates were two women, meaning that from December, Mexico will be governed by a woman for the first time. This paper sets out ...
  • Authors
    April 6, 2022
    The insurrection of 6 January 2021, when supporters of then President Donald Trump stormed the US Congress in Washington DC, “is widely viewed as a seminal moment in the history of US democracy,” noted the British The Guardian (January 9, 2022). “Never before had the modern nation witnessed such an organized, violent attempt to overthrow the elected government. Never before, not even at the height of the Civil War, had the Confederated flag flown over the halls of Congress.” This w ...
  • Authors
    November 22, 2021
    Richard Blumenthal, the US Democratic Senator from Connecticut, was shaken by the testimonies of top officials of the Department of Justice during the August 2021 Congressional hearings. The Officials recounted how the former President, Donald Trump, through phone and in private meetings, pressured them to falsify the results of the November 2020 Presidential: "say that the election was corrupt and leave the rest to the congressmen and me". (”Mother Jones”, July 30, 2021) Blumenthal ...
  • May 17, 2021
    Joe Biden’s victory in the U.S. elections was widely anticipated, and much of what has happened since he took office on January 21 has conformed to his election promise. The progress he helped steer in vaccinations and repairing the pandemic’s economic damage is especially impressive. However, the first 100 days of his term have also seen major unexpected developments. Three of these surprises have both major implications for the U.S. economic outlook, and global repercussions. The ...