Publications /
Opinion

Back
A New Evil is Bringing Down the World
March 24, 2021

It was an illusion. A dream or wishful thinking—and some fake news. Scientists would develop a vaccine at break-neck speed. It would be available for all, wealthy nations sharing with the poor. But unfortunately the COVID-19 deaths continue to mount. The world is facing a maddening bottleneck, predicted in October 2020 by the Policy Center for the New South on its opinion page, quoting scientists calculations that twelve to fifteen billion vaccine shots were needed, but glass manufacturers would be unable to deliver the needed vials in time, and the distribution process would be extremely difficult and slow for the first generation of vaccines.

Some nations are on schedule, the United Kingdom, for example, Morocco, Israel, Monaco. But Europe suffers, not at least because the European Union roll out has been lackluster, forcing European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen to admit: “Of course, a country on its own can be a speedboat, the EU is more like a tanker”. Slow to maneuver, difficult to accelerate. “The west should pay attention to Russia and China’s vaccine diplomacy”, warned the Financial Times in February. Its writer, Anne-Sylvaine Chassany, noted that “since the start of the pandemic China and Russia have used medical supplies to pursue foreign policy gains”. Both sent masks and protective gear to hard-hit countries last spring. “Now they are promising their vaccines-with some success. With richer nations grapping the bulk of the authorized shots from western companies, low to middle class countries from Brazil and Nigeria to Algeria and Egypt are looking to Moscow and Beijing for doses”. China pledged half a billion doses to 45 nations, including buyers in Latin America and the Middle East. Vaccines from state-owned Sinopharme, reported the Financial Times, are distributed in the United Arab Emirates and the Balkans. Sinovac received orders from Turkey and Brazil. Hungary has bought two million doses of Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine, rolling it out in February. It also granted approval to a Chinese vaccine, with Prime Minister Victor Orban receiving one of the first jabs. Beijing, wrote the Financial Times“has made a lasting impression by being the first provider of aid to many countries outside the EU, in particular in some of the poorest African nations”.

As wealthy countries inoculate millions of their citizens against COVID-19, noted Foreign Policy (March 1, 2021) and other countries wait to even begin the roll out, “G-7 leaders are increasingly struggling to address geopolitically charged vaccine inequities”. French President Emmanuel Macron recently noted his fear that countries would turn to China and Russia for vaccines and “the power of the west will … not be a reality”.

In her recent Policy Brief (Nationalisme Vaccinal a l’ere de la Covid 19: un frein a l’endiguement de la pandémie), Salma Daoudi of the Policy Center for the New South concluded that “a new evil is bringing down the world—vaccine nationalism”. This race against time, against others and against nature, Daoudi wrote, has not only given birth to a new form of nationalism, but “this geopolitical competition also bears the seal of a deep-rooted cold war logic, still resisting the test of time, the fruits of a historic rivalry dividing the world into distant blocks. Although the western powers are clearly in competition in developing a vaccine, they are still open to a certain level of cooperation as demonstrated by various agreements between the EU, the U.S. and the United Kingdom”. Rather, the real geopolitical antagonism positions them against Russia and China, she wrote. Russian and Chinese success is perceived, particularly by the United States, “as an existential threat to the hegemonic domination of the Western world, given the economic and diplomatic gains intrinsically linked to the discovery of a vaccine”.

A number of cyberattacks have been registered, for which China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea have been blamed. Iran has been named as the perpetrator of an attack against Gilead, the American pharmaceutical laboratory, whose Remdesivir was cleared as a treatment for certain severe COVID-19 cases. Ironically, stated Daoudi, the arms race is turning into a vaccine race. This new cold war will hardly promise a better world. Whatever the result, argues the scholar, who studied international relations and politics at Cambridge University, “like any conflict, it will cause collateral damage, and like any other race, it will leave some on the sidelines, breathless, unable to compete with American, European, Chinese, and Russian machines”.

Although about 50 vaccine candidates were in work last fall in countries including India, Turkey, Thailand, and even Brazil (which has one of the world’s worst death tolls from the virus), other emerging economies, severely suffocating through the health and political economic crises, do not have sufficient means to pay for access rights or the infrastructure necessary for mass production of pharmaceutical products. These countries may find themselves deprived of vaccines that can relieve the pressure on health systems that are increasingly weakened. Lack of vaccine access could also undermine those countries’ long-term economic, diplomatic, and strategic interests. Author Salma Daoudi: “Inequitable access to the vaccine against the virus would perpetuate the inequalities and jeopardize the health security of millions of people around the world”.

 

The opinions expressed in this article belong to the author.

RELATED CONTENT

  • February 8, 2022
    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the “war on drugs” by President Richard Nixon. Since then, law-enforcement responses are primarily used to counter the production, trafficking and consumption of illegal drugs. The international control regime based on the prohi...
  • February 8, 2022
    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the “war on drugs” by President Richard Nixon. Since then, law-enforcement responses are primarily used to counter the production, trafficking and consumption of illegal drugs. The international control regime based on the prohi...
  • February 8, 2022
    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the declaration of the “war on drugs” by President Richard Nixon. Since then, law-enforcement responses are primarily used to counter the production, trafficking and consumption of illegal drugs. The international control regime based on the prohi...
  • Authors
    February 3, 2022
    His message was one of reassurance, just as a great leader has to react in a crisis. The concerns about Covid 19 was nothing but “a frenzy and psychosis”. The President knew the secret to defeat the virus: vodka, sauna, tractor. Didn’t a US president named Donald Trump suggest  that toilet cleaning disinfectants chase the virus out of infected lungs on national television? (New York Times, April 24, 2020) That was Trump-speak, sure, but the man who uttered the tractor/vodka/nonsense ...
  • Authors
    February 3, 2022
    COVID-19 has ravaged nearly every country in the world, with the globalization of recent decades intensifying its spread. As of mid-2021, the world had spent $16.5 trillion—18% of global GDP—to fight the disease. And that amount does not even include the most important losses such as deaths, mental health effects, restrictions on human freedom, and other nonmonetary suffering. Nearly 90% of this spending was by developed economies, with the rest by emerging market and developing eco ...
  • Authors
    January 26, 2022
    COVID-19 has caused serious damage throughout the entire world. As of mid-2021, the global fiscal cost of COVID-19—excluding the most important consequences, such as human lives, mental health effects, restrictions of human freedom, and other non-pecuniary components, have amounted to at least $16.5 trillion, about 18% of world GDP (Dinh 2021). Financial support has varied across countries depending on income level, political willingness, and the extent of the pandemic in each econo ...
  • Authors
    December 29, 2021
    Après une longue période de prix atones, le café a vu ses cours se raffermir au cours de l’année 2020 et du premier trimestre 2021, avant de flamber durant l’été et l’automne. Il renouait alors avec des plus hauts niveaux depuis 2011, date de la fin du dernier « super-cycle des matières premières (2002-2011). Tandis que la demande progresse structurellement, l’offre s’est repliée, pénalisée par une conjonction de facteurs climatiques, géopolitiques et, bien évidemment, sanitaires en ...
  • Authors
    Gerson Javier Pérez Valbuena
    Diana Ricciulli
    Jaime Bonet
    Inácio Araújo
    Fernando Perobelli
    December 28, 2021
    This paper analyses the regional economic differences in the impact of lockdown measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 ordered by Colombia’s national gov­ernment. Using an input-output model, we estimate regional economic losses by extracting a group of formal and informal workers from different sectors of the economy. Results show regional differences in the impact of lockdown measures on their labour markets, local economies, and productive sectors. We also find that periphera ...
  • December 15, 2021
    Since its emergence, the new coronavirus has continued to bring many uncertainties, whether in terms of health aspects, policy measures or social and economic consequences. If there is, however, one certainty in this Covid-19 era, it is that the pandemic is a turning point in human hist...
  • Authors
    December 6, 2021
    Between January 2020 and June 2021, the world spent about US $16.5 trillion (18% of world GDP) to fight COVID-19, and this amount does not even include the most important losses such as deaths, mental health effects, restrictions on human freedom, and other nonmonetary suffering. Nearly 90% of this amount was spent by developed economies; the rest by emerging market and developing economies. Low-income countries spent just US $12.5 billion, or less than 0.0001% of the total. Moreove ...