Podcasts

Back

Le retour du risque géopolitique : Le triangle stratégique Russie, Chine, États-Unis

21
January 2016
Thomas Gomart 

Ce podcast est délivré par Thomas Gomart. A partir d'une réflexion sur le risque pays, Thomas Gomart analyse les relations entre Washington, Pékin et Moscou en se focalisant sur les questions numériques, énergétiques et de sécurité. Ces trois puissances forment un triangle stratégique ayant à lui seul une dimension systémique. Il offre un point d'observation privilégié des transformations en cours du système international.
Cette recherche vise à améliorer les capacités d'anticipation des entreprises privées et des acteurs publics, qui nécessitent des capacités d'identification et de formulation des problèmes politiques rencontrés dans leurs activités. S'ils ne s'intéressent pas à la géopolitique, la géopolitique s'intéresse à eux.

L’intervention répond aux questions suivantes :

1) Quelle est la part que vous accordez à la géopolitique dans le risque pays ?
2) Quel est le triangle stratégique et quelles sont les conséquences de la transformation du triangle.
3) Pouvez-vous faire un point sur les relations bilatérales des membres du triangles, en précisant l’évolution de la relation Russo-Américaine ?

RELATED CONTENT

  • Taking Down the Sign: Carney’s Wake-Up Call to Middle Powers
    February 13, 2026
    There is a story told by Václav Havel, the Czech dissident writer who later became president after the fall of communism. In his essay The Power of the Powerless, Havel describes a shopkeeper who, every morning, places a sign in his window reading: “Workers of the world, unite!” He does not believe in it. Nor do the people around him. Yet the sign remains. ...
  • Download PDF
    Internationally Fragmented Data Could Lead to Geopolitically Antagonistic AI
    Authors
    Hung Q. Tran
    February 12, 2026
    Divergent regulatory regimes for data, driven by different motivations, ranging from privacy protection in the European Union to information control in China, could eventually produce distinctively different, and possibly contradictory, bodies of data. Artificial-intelligence models trained on those datasets could produce differing and possibly even conflicting outputs. To the extent that AI outputs start to shape human perception and to influence decisions, in governments and ...
  • Download PDF
    The New South as a Frontline of the U.S.-China Technological Rivalry
    Authors
    Otaviano Canuto
    February 11, 2026
    The U.S.–China technological rivalry has become a central axis of global economic and geopolitical competition. While the United States continues to lead in frontier innovation—most notably in advanced semiconductors and artificial intelligence (AI)—China has consolidated strengths in large-scale implementation, manufacturing capacity, and control over critical segments of global supply chains. These advantages are especially visible in clean energy technologies and in the processin ...
  • Unlocking the Sahel, Reconfiguring the Western Mediterranean: Morocco’s Atlantic Initiative as an Integration Corridor
    Authors
    Amine Ghoulidi
    Rida Lyammouri
    February 5, 2026
    This Paper was originally published on orient-online.com  The Western Mediterranean’s exposure to the Sahel is usually framed in terms of security spillovers and crisis management. This paper argues that this framing misreads how Sahelian access conditions now shape Mediterranean integration. Morocco’s Atlantic Initiative is a state-led corridor strategy combining Atlantic port infrastructure, inland transit routes, and energy systems to connect landlocked Sahelian economi ...
  • Download PDF
    The Silent Majority of the New South: Small States, Davos 2026, and the Last Line of International Law
    Authors
    Ferid Belhaj
    Otaviano Canuto
    February 4, 2026
    This article examines the quiet but profound implications of the erosion of U.S.-led hegemony for small and vulnerable states of the New South. While the post-1945 international order was never egalitarian, it offered predictability: power was organized through law, and sovereignty for weaker states rested less on justice than on procedural stability. Davos 2026 marked a turning point in the public acknowledgment of that system’s unraveling. Statements by leading Western figures rev ...
  • Download PDF
    The Renaissance of Economic Warfare
    Authors
    Ian O. Lesser
    February 3, 2026
    From the use of tariffs as a foreign policy instrument, to the weaponization of critical resources, and from targeted sanctions to attacks on critical infrastructure, economic security is at the forefront of international debates. The aggressive use of economic instruments for strategic purposes has become an explicit feature of international affairs, in a way not seen since the interwar period[1]. Beyond the weaponization of resources of all kinds, an increasing ‘monetization’ is u ...
  • Trump, le Groenland et le devenir des relations transatlantiques
    January 30, 2026
    En 2019, Donald Trump a proposé d’acheter le Groenland, déclenchant un refus catégorique du Danemark et une tension diplomatique transatlantique. Cette initiative reflétait l’intérêt stratégique et économique des États-Unis pour l’Arctique et ses ressources. L’épisode a mis en lumière l...
  • Beyond Davos 2026: Economic Policy under Structural Constraint
    Authors
    Rim Berahab
    January 30, 2026
    The 2026 World Economic Forum (WEF) Annual Meeting took place in an environment of elevated economic uncertainty and structural risk repricing. According to the Global Risks Report (GRR) 2026, geoeconomic confrontation and economic downturn rank among the most severe near-term risks, while inflation-related risks and economic volatility have risen sharply in perceived severity compared with the previous edition. Notably, 50% of respondents to the Global Risks Perception Survey ...
  • Download PDF
    La souveraineté des pays de l’Alliance du Sahel : Ambitions et contraintes
    Authors
    Nezha Alaoui M’hammdi
    Larabi Jaïdi
    January 29, 2026
    Le Mali, le Burkina Faso et le Niger, réunis au sein de l’Alliance des États du Sahel (AES), affirment l’ambition de bâtir une souveraineté nationale qui leur permettrait de s’émanciper de la domination et des influences extérieures et de se doter d’une liberté d’action dans les choix de développement politique et économique. Cependant, cette ambition se heurte à de nombreuses contraintes économiques et sécuritaires.La souveraineté ne peut se construire sans une base économique soli ...