Publications /
Opinion

Back
Senegal’s Presidential Elections: a Test to the Country’s Democratic Credentials
Authors
Mayecor Sar
April 18, 2019

The author is an alumnus of the 2015 Atlantic Dialogues Emerging Leaders program

On the 2nd of April 2019, Macky Sall was sworn in as President of the Republic of Senegal for a second five year term, after scoring a resounding 58.7% victory in the first round of the country’s elections. This solemn official ceremony has brought to a close the bitter contest that opposed the President to four challengers that included two former government ministers (Idrissa Seck and Madicke Niang), a local social media sensation (Ousmane Sonko) and a university professor (Issa Sall).    

Macky Sall’s Victory

Macky Sall’s victory, which was unceremoniously announced by the Head of the National Vote Counting Commission less than a week after the last vote was cast, came amid a confusing situation that saw different camps claiming victory on the night of the election. This episode put Senegal’s whole electoral process under the spotlight, with some even suggesting that Senegal’s reputation as an accomplished democracy was overrated. 

This is the result of a latent climate of mistrust and finger-pointing that has plagued Macky Sall’s whole first term. Indeed, ever since he took office President Sall has been bedeviled by accusations regarding his governance record that, some critics argue, has been illiberal and geared towards setting the perfect conditions for his reelection. 
This reputation stems from the jailing of Karim Wade, the son of Macky Sall’s predecessor, Abdoulaye Wade, and that of the popular mayor of Dakar Khalifa Sall, who the opposition claim are the victims of a politically motivated plot to get rid of Macky Sall’s most serious opponents. 

The Senegalese Democracy

Macky Sall’s supporters argue in return that institutions are strong and independent. They point for example to the new constitution that amongst other things, reduces the Presidential term from 7 to 5 years and reinforces the rights of opposition parties, adopted after the 2016 referendum furthers Senegal’s democracy and freedom.
This war of words reached its apex during the implementation of a controversial sponsorship system, which requires each candidate to garner the signature of a number of patrons, amounting to roughly 0.8% of the voting population. Despite opposition parties and some activist groups crying foul over the whole process, the pool of candidates was reduced to five finalists from a whopping eighty-seven applicants. All in all, whether the opposition’s accusations were justified or not, they only served to weaken Senegal’s hard-earned reputation as a stellar democracy.  

Yet the sentiment on the ground - and that despite many arguing to the contrary - is that Senegal’s democracy remains robust. This view was corroborated by more than 5000 international observers, tasked with monitoring the elections, who described the process as “very good news” for Senegal.      
Moreover, the relatively high participation rate of 66.2% of registered voters (compared to 51% in 2012), seems to point to an inclusive and fair process. Opposition parties seem to agree with that part of the argument. Indeed, their official stance after the results were announced, is that although they disagree with the president on the manner in which the process was conducted, they do not possess enough evidence to formally contest the election results; they thus reluctantly accepted the results. 

What to Expect 

However, as he embarks on his 2nd term, high on the President’s in-tray will be to mend the rift created by the divisions of his first term. He seems to understand this. In his victory speech he invited the opposition parties to discuss ways in which they can collaborate to advance some of the most pressing issues. He also reiterated this point in his inauguration speech. 

As for the Senegalese people, they have voted peacefully, went back to work next day and let institutions such as the National Vote Counting Commission and the Constitutional Council do the rest. This alone is a clear indication of the mutual trust between citizens and their institutions, which is probably a better barometer of Senegal’s democracy than international perception.    

RELATED CONTENT

  • May 20, 2021
    Le Policy Center lance une nouvelle émission. Africafé, le nouveau rendez-vous bimensuel présenté par Youssef Tobi, spécialiste en relations internationales, décryptera l'actualité des organisations africaines et du continent avec des experts africains. Pour ce deuxième épisode, Larabi ...
  • Authors
    Sabine Cessou
    May 11, 2021
    « Les rivalités de puissance en Afrique » ont été décryptées, le 4 mai 2021, lors de la 10ème édition des « Dialogues stratégiques », plateforme d’analyse et d’échange Nord-Sud qui, deux fois par an, réunit les experts et chercheurs du Policy Center for the New South (Rabat) et du Centre HEC de Géopolitique (Paris). Nouzha Chekrouni, Senior Fellow au Policy Center, a rappelé en introduction que la « reconfiguration du monde post-Covid-19 semble se cristalliser autour des tensions e ...
  • May 07, 2021
    La région du Maghreb, post-Covid-19, fait face à des défis structurels de taille. Antérieur à la pandémie, les tensions géopolitiques et socioéconomiques empêchent les pays maghrébins d’a ...
  • May 6, 2021
    Africafé, l'émission de décryptage de l'actualité des organisations africaines avec des experts africains arrive enfin sur vos écrans. Pour cette première édition, le présentateur de l'émission bimensuel, Youssef Tobi, accueille Khalid Chegraoui, Senior Fellow au Policy Center for the N...
  • May 4, 2021
    The Sahelian states of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso continue to face unprecedented violence arising from multidimensional conflicts. According to the Africa Center for Strategic Studies (2019), “the Sahel has experienced the most rapid increase in activity by militant groups of any region in Africa in recent years. Violent events involving extremist groups in the region have doubled every year since 2015”. In addition to the presence of multiple violent extremist organizations (VEO ...
  • Authors
    Eugène Berg
    Pascal Chaigneau
    Jérémy Ghez
    May 3, 2021
    Les Dialogues Stratégiques, une collaboration entre HEC Center for Geopolitcs et Policy Center for the New South, représentent une plateforme d’analyse et d’échange biannuelle réunissant des experts, des praticiens, des décideurs politiques, ainsi que le monde universitaire et les médias au service d’une réflexion critique et approfondie sur les tendances politiques mondiales et les grandes questions d’importance commune pour l’Europe et l’Afrique. Cette publication est issue de la ...
  • Authors
    April 20, 2021
    The briefing document by Ambassador Dr. Len Ishmael created in collaboration with MDPD KAS reviews the process of the EU-OACPS negotiations, reviews the process of the EU-OACPS negotiations, with a view to providing insights on the following issues: - The challenges and bottlenecks in the process and those issues that have created tension. - The future roles of the African Union (AU) and #OACPS Secretariats in the EU-OACPS relationship, and in Africa’s relationship with the #EU. ...